Transfer defense over 1N
#41
Posted 2011-November-15, 09:38
Look at it for opponents point of view
It allow 2 options for bidding a suits . direct bid & Pass and bid,
It allow 3 options for X. X and pass, X and X & pass and X
It also allow a cheap cuebid.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#42
Posted 2011-November-15, 16:12
benlessard, on 2011-November-15, 09:38, said:
Look at it for opponents point of view
It allow 2 options for bidding a suits . direct bid & Pass and bid,
It allow 3 options for X. X and pass, X and X & pass and X
It also allow a cheap cuebid.
The described hand is on the table if we play.
Wild two-suiters can get both suits in, and you can (at least frequently) distinguish which one's longer.
At least with the system I used to play, you don't get to bid 2♣, so you don't overcall on stupid club hands. In addition, when you *do* overcall in clubs, you take the entire 2 level away (while still allowing lebensohl over 2♠, of course).
None of the above apply when we choose to pass the transfer to play in our suit, of course, but then again, neither of your first two apply either. When you overcall very aggressively, the chance that "my suit is better than your suit" is high enough that the opponents do have to deal with it (I would suggest that the right hand for that came up once or twice a year (almost always in diamonds, for some reason)).
#43
Posted 2011-November-15, 20:49
#44
Posted 2011-November-15, 22:26
2♦: either major (multi, but not weak)
to
2♦: transfer to ♥s
2♥: transfer to ♠s
Scheme 1 (2♦=1M) frees up the use of 2♥ for other meanings, at not that much cost compared to the transfers of Scheme 2.
#45
Posted 2011-November-16, 01:28
PS Glen there is a typo in your signature its a great quote by H.L Mencken
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#46
Posted 2011-November-16, 02:27
George Carlin
#47
Posted 2011-November-16, 09:17
the hog, on 2011-November-15, 20:49, said:
Hi Ron, what is SOAP? I can't google it.
#48
Posted 2011-November-16, 09:51
George Carlin
#49
Posted 2011-November-16, 10:33
glen, on 2011-November-15, 22:26, said:
2♦: either major (multi, but not weak)
to
2♦: transfer to ♥s
2♥: transfer to ♠s
Scheme 1 (2♦=1M) frees up the use of 2♥ for other meanings, at not that much cost compared to the transfers of Scheme 2.
Having said that, it will change eventually. I'm hoping, really, that when it does, we go back to "all defences to NT allowed" rather than carving another "one-system" exception into the GCC.
#50
Posted 2011-November-16, 11:45
#51
Posted 2011-November-16, 12:56
mycroft, on 2011-November-16, 10:33, said:
lol.
<Something involving Americans and safety labels to rude to say publicly>
#52
Posted 2011-November-16, 18:08
jillybean, on 2011-November-16, 11:45, said:
There is more to it than that.
Over 2C 2D denies a H fit and shows 4 or 5 S; same with 2D 2H.
2NT over 1NT shows the minors.
SOAP stands for System over artifical pre emption. It can be used over ferts and other artificial pre emptive bids as well as over 1NT. We use it as a generic defence to these bids.
#53
Posted 2011-November-17, 03:26
jillybean, on 2011-November-16, 11:45, said:
Jillybean imitating Lurpoa, now I've seen everything
#54
Posted 2011-November-18, 00:11
Free, on 2011-November-17, 03:26, said:
♥ ♥ ♥
I think it is fun
♥♥♥