BBO Discussion Forums: At the club today - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

At the club today

#1 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,932
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2026-September-15, 16:45


“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
0

#2 User is offline   akwoo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,763
  • Joined: 2010-November-21

Posted 2026-September-15, 17:13

6 controls and 4 trump is great. 3H. Though I seriously hope their black suit singleton is the spade, not the club.
1

#3 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,171
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2026-September-15, 18:19

Strongly prefer super accepting with 3H rather than 2H.
0

#4 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,365
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted 2026-September-16, 02:45

As this is N/B, someone should explain that responder is showing 5+ hearts and 4+ diamonds, game forcing.

I like my hand for playing in hearts, rather less a possible 3541 dummy, as akwoo points out.
3H is fine and already a positive move, let's see what he has to say now.
0

#5 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,932
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2026-September-16, 05:46

This is not much of a poll, with 2 votes for 3
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
0

#6 User is offline   mw64ahw 

  • nonconformist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,196
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted 2026-September-16, 06:51

View Postjillybean, on 2026-September-16, 05:46, said:

This is not much of a poll, with 2 votes for 3

make it 3 on the control count rather than min/max
0

#7 User is online   TMorris 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 321
  • Joined: 2008-May-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2026-September-16, 07:17

I would also have bid 3 in response to the 2 bid. For me this is a minimum with four card support.
1

#8 User is offline   mw64ahw 

  • nonconformist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,196
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted 2026-September-16, 08:59

Beyond the N/B forum, but Marty Bergen suggested a series of min/max 4/3-card super-accepts
0

#9 User is offline   apollo1201 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,310
  • Joined: 2014-June-01

Posted 2026-September-16, 09:29

The bid I might have done before, 3H

4H would be undisciplined unless a terrible hand with a weak H fit and full of black values

KQJx
xxx
Kx
KQJx
0

#10 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,365
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted 2026-September-16, 11:08

 mw64ahw, on 2026-September-16, 08:59, said:

Beyond the N/B forum, but Marty Bergen suggested a series of min/max 4/3-card super-accepts


I played a similar series for several years and wouldn't recommend it even to I/A. I can live quite comfortably with just one super accept, although we actually play two in hearts (4 card and 3 card).
0

#11 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,932
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2026-September-16, 12:37

Dear Moderators, we can now move this thread to the IBFL - simple rulings thread.
What could be more simple?



North (6 year veteran) announced 2 as hearts.
South (mentee) looked horrified and started to take bidding cards off the table
North said. "you have to leave it now".
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
0

#12 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,365
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted 2026-September-16, 15:29

View Postjillybean, on 2026-September-16, 12:37, said:

Dear Moderators, we can now move this thread to the IBFL - simple rulings thread.
What could be more simple?



North (6 year veteran) announced 2 as hearts.
South (mentee) looked horrified and started to take bidding cards off the table
North said. "you have to leave it now".



A reply for the other forum, but I think the ruling is not completely simple.
Maybe we do not need to poll to establish that 4 in a 9 card fit with minimum and two diamonds ruffs in hand was an LA to 3NT, but we do need to evaluate how well they would both have scored.
We also have to decide whether to penalize North for betraying his role as mentor, not calling the Director immediately and then waiting until he could more subtly take advantage of UI (for me it is automatic, but many tell me I hear a different drum).
0

#13 User is offline   HardVector 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 551
  • Joined: 2018-May-28

Posted 2026-September-16, 20:40

As soon as the face was made, and the table talk occurred, the opps should have called the director.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users