BBO Discussion Forums: oh, oh. do I have any company? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

oh, oh. do I have any company?

#41 User is online   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,210
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted Yesterday, 09:41

View Postjillybean, on 2026-August-24, 07:28, said:

I’d like to see how this is bid with unbalanced .




With the ugly duckling predecessor (unbalanced 1NT) we might bid either:

__________ 1N
2 (range ask) - 2N (min)
3 (clubs, splinter) - 3
4 - 4
4 - 4N (even)
5 - 5
7 - P


or at MP:

__________ 1N
2 (ask) - 2 (no 5cM)
3(clubs) - 4 (fix)
4 - 4
4 - 4N (even)
5 - 5
7 - P
0

#42 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,871
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted Yesterday, 15:11

I play an unbalanced 1D but I wouldn’t open this 1D in a strong notrump seat (we play variable 1N). Why? For the same reason mainstream players open this 1N. 16 hcp is a difficult range to show after 1D. It’s not strong enough to reverse…even those players who consider a good 16 enough (I need a great 16) would likely jibe at the notion that this hand is a good 16.

So one is left opening 1D and, over a 1S response,having to underbid/distort shape via 1N or overbid via 2H or distort shape in a different way by bidding either 2C or 2D. All of the above make the offshape 1N clearly the best of the various imperfect choices. Anyone who claims an easy auction after 1D 1S or 1N is kidding…themselves or us. Even specialized methods would struggle. I doubt many Gazilli players would enjoy bidding 2C (I may be wrong here…I know a bit about Gazilli but haven’t played it).

Of course, on the actual hand 1D works wonderfully, regardless of whether it’s unbalanced or not. If we were NV, I’d have to open 1D since 1N is 10-13.

1D 2C natural, gf.

Opener has the worlds easiest 2H bid, regardless of whether, as I do, it shows a little extra.

Raising clubs is imo very poor. Responder, playing normal methods, could easily have 4 hearts and longer clubs. Why throw the heart suit away? Btw, after 1D 2C 3C 3H, I doubt there’s a good player anywhere in the world who plays that as showing a 4 card suit. It’s a probe for 3N and the last thing responder usually wants to see is a ‘raise’.

No…by far the best route is 2H. Over this we can handle virtually any action responder is likely to take.

2S…we bid 3C, showing our 1=4=5=3 or less likely 0=4=6=3.

2N…we bid 3C, again showing our shape

3C….we bid 4S, splinter, or 4C, inviting a 4D cue. I prefer 4C…4S makes a diamond cue comfortable high.

3D….our diamond fit will be as good or better than clubs so we’ve found trump. I’d bid 3S (not 3H which is how I’d bid 5=6 reds)

3H…perfect. We have a good trump suit and I’ll cue 3S to see what happens. I’ll pull an improbable natural 3N to 4C

And so on. I’d pass a jump to 3N unless we have an agreement that this shows significant extras.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#43 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,756
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted Yesterday, 17:34

View Postmikeh, on 2026-August-24, 15:11, said:


Raising clubs is imo very poor. Responder, playing normal methods, could easily have 4 hearts and longer clubs. Why throw the heart suit away? Btw, after 1D 2C 3C 3H, I doubt there’s a good player anywhere in the world who plays that as showing a 4 card suit. It’s a probe for 3N and the last thing responder usually wants to see is a ‘raise’.



I really need some help regarding shape vs. stoppers
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
0

#44 User is offline   WasWinM 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 365
  • Joined: 2025-April-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:varied

Posted Yesterday, 20:07

I'm trying real hard to remember but it seems like in Mike Lawrence's version of 2/1 he advocated that a raise of a minor suit 2/1 should be based on either 4-card support or extra value. A rebid of opener's major was kind of the catch-all bid when no other bids fit the system; however, it's like MikeH said, if you have extras and a 4-card major there is no reason to bury the major by raising partner's minor immediately.
0

#45 User is offline   DavidKok 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,576
  • Joined: 2020-March-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted Today, 00:09

 mikeh, on 2026-August-24, 15:11, said:

Even specialized methods would struggle. I doubt many Gazilli players would enjoy bidding 2C (I may be wrong here…I know a bit about Gazilli but haven’t played it).
I agree with the whole post and just wanted to elaborate that in the Gazzilli structure I know over unbalanced diamond we use the 1NT bid, not the 2 bid, as the artificial option (showing 16+ almost any hand with at most 3-card support, or 11-15 6(+) max 23). On this opening hand such an artificial 1NT would help, allowing the auction 1-1; 1NT*-2*; 2.
0

#46 User is online   mw64ahw 

  • nonconformist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,161
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted Today, 01:47

View PostDavidKok, on 2026-August-25, 00:09, said:

I agree with the whole post and just wanted to elaborate that in the Gazzilli structure I know over unbalanced diamond we use the 1NT bid, not the 2 bid, as the artificial option (showing 16+ almost any hand with at most 3-card support, or 11-15 6(+) max 23). On this opening hand such an artificial 1NT would help, allowing the auction 1-1; 1NT*-2*; 2.

Does West really bid 1 on this hand?
0

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
2 members, 1 guests, 1 anonymous users

  1. sfi,
  2. awm