[benellis58]

Typically stupid lead:

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/yckk7hhy

[benellis58]

West wins his offside heart king at trick three. Of COURSE he returns a HEART at trick four, because these worthless GIBBO pieces of filth LOVE to return the suit DECLARER plays. What absolute M.O.R.O.N.S. these useless dolts are! East later fails to cash his spade ace.

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2p92zv8w

[benellis58]

The ignorant GIBBO piece of trash in the North fails to ruff the heart at trick five. The braindead piece of garbage doesn't even have the (feeble) excuse that a (sleepy) human might have had: namely that he forgot what had happened and (mistakenly) thought that South's 5 was high. Robots DON'T forget, so the sickening GIBBO jackass KNEW that South's 5 was NOT a winner and still STUPIDLY failed to ruff it. Please attach cement blocks to all GIBBO robots and then throw all the worthless monstrosities into the deepest ocean you can find.

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/3fnb8yp3

[benellis58]

Useless GIBBO piece of trash that he is, Superstooge in the East leads a heart, the suit that SOUTH bid. I guess it would be WAY too tough for the simpleminded M.O.R.O.N. to lead a spade, the suit that he AND his "partner" BOTH bid. It's almost impossible to believe that EVEN the useless, repulsive GIBBO robots can be as TOTALLY hopeless as they CONSISTENTLY are. Worst of the worst, lowest of the low, complete stinking garbage at anything and everything bridge-related. GIB/GIBBO rots.

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2p9ecu9n

[benellis58]

Although we scored 100 % on this board for "only" going one down, North's 2NT is still a bid that makes no sense, and the pathetic GIB definition of it is the total JOKE that we have come to EXPECT from the permanent rot that is GIB/GIBBO.

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/d6fuxnah

[benellis58]

After an uninterrupted enemy auction of 1C by South, 1S by North, 1NT by South, West wisely decides to lead one of the two unbid suits (diamonds and hearts). Bravo, Mr. West: You have just led us to believe that you are more clever than 99.99 % of your braindead GIBBO brethren.

But you have also confirmed that you are (far!) LESS clever than any human bridge players, because for Lord knows what reason, you opted to lead from your TWO-card red suit rather than from your FOUR-card one. Dweeb!

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/bdhn8v63

[benellis58]

West's 2S is defined as an "AGGRESSIVE (!) weak jump overcall"!!! Oh, yes, he's SO macho! Where did he EVER get the SUPREME courage it took to pre-empt with "ONLY" TEN...GOOD...HCP, SEVEN pretty good spades. and a 7-1-2-3 shape?

Then again, the GIBBO numbskulls have frequently proven to be craven, quivering, spineless cowards on many recent hands, so maybe by the "standards" of these milquetoast wimps, it IS "aggressive". What a despicable bunch of losers these useless GIBBO robots are!

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/yckmthwm

[benellis58]

I've often mentioned that in games with three GIBBO robots I frequently operate or "experiment", largely because I'm well aware even before the first hand is dealt that I will be playing "with" a complete and utter M.O.R.O.N. and against two complete and utter M.O.R.O,N.S., because ALL GIBBO robots are complete and utter M.O.R.O.N.S.

These operations and "experiments" give me an opportunity to have "fun" that I could not have in a "real" bridge game with humans, because I would not do these things in such a game.

My operations succeed more often than not, since it is evident that if they did NOT, I would stop performing them.

But of course, they do not always succeed. Here's one that didn't. Since my bidding was - shall we say: not exactly traditional, I will be a sport and take some of the blame, but now that I have finished my attempt at being noble (ha, ha), take a look at the MIND-BLOWINGLY STUPID...LEAP (!) to SIX (!) diamonds by the piece of GIBBO dirt in the North!

Since the hand was played on BBO, it's no surprise WHATSOEVER that enemy trumps (diamonds) were 5-1. What IS surprising is that the GIBBO codfish in the West actually found the BEST (!) lead of a club! Yes, it's a childishly easy, perfectly NORMAL lead that even a raw beginner would find, but for a stinking GIBBO robot it is a MONUMENTAL achievement, so let's give him the praise that a GIBBO robot almost NEVER gets.

Yet despite West's FINE club lead, I STILL went down ("only") one in 6D, because the GIBBO imbecile in the East "defended" EXACTLY as you would EXPECT these walking, talking HORRORSHOWS to do: After winning his ace of spades at trick three, the imbecilic GIBBO buffoon played a SPADE (!!) rather than a club, sticking with the PHENOMENALLY stupid GIBBO principle of HATING to return "partner's" suit but LOVING to return DECLARER'S! And if anything, THIS was even worse than usual, because West...against SIX (!) diamonds had not just led ANY club - he had led the KING! These nauseating, contemptible GIBBO pieces if dirt find NEW and CREATIVE ways to show off their ENORMOUS ignorance every single day! It's amazing!

Oh, and by the way, had North PASSED 3NT, yes, we WOULD hve had a GOOD score...but the fleabrain felt that he HAD to LEAP to SIX diamonds over THREE no trump. What a JERK! But to be fair, he's no MORE of a jerk than ANY other piece of GIBBO trash. They ALL rot.

https://www.bridgeba...HT%7Cmc%7C11%7C

[benellis58]

North opens 1C on a mere TEN HCP. You might or might not agree with this, but in any case, it is LONG past the time for GIB to CHANGE its INCORRECT, INACCURATE, and most of all DISHONEST definitions for ALL its one-level suit opening bids, because they ALL (whether 1C, 1D, 1H, or 1S) are defined by GIB as showing "11-21 HCP", yet THIS hand and countless others prove that the GIB definition is a complete LIE! GIB/GIBBO stinks in numerous ways, but it should at least be able to provide HONEST definitions after ALL THESE YEARS! Clearly, someone somewhere went out of his way to write this INACCURATE definition, and equally clearly, after DECADES, no one has ever bothered to correct it...which is shameful!

As the auction progresses, North, who has already OPENED an ACELESS...TEN-count...decides that he MUST...cuebid (!) 4C over South's 3NT. EVEN if you believe that it might be okay to cue despite his sub-minimum opening bid (according to his own GIB definition), it is NOT okay, given that the GIB definition of his 4C cue says that it shows the ACE of clubs...which he does NOT have. I, south, naively thought that for ONCE the I.D.I.O.T. might actually HAVE his bid (especially since it's not exactly wise to LIE about a first-round control...to your "partner" in a STRONG auction that is potentially considering a SLAM)! Not wanting to further complicate the auction (which is usually a GUARANTEED way to have your centre-hand opponent destroy you), and "KNOWING" that we had first or second-round control of all suits, and KNOWING that the ONLY ace we MIGHT be missing was diamonds, I was willing to give up on a grand and leap to the VERY likely 6S.

Upon seeing dummy, I realized that not only had GIB LIED with its definition of 1C, but that, much more importantly, the stinking piece of GIBBO trash sitting across from me had LIED about having the ace of clubs.

Also, check out post # 2530 immediately below to see what happened with this board at three other tables. The GIBBO stupidity there is perhaps even WORSE than the GIBBO stupidity here! Words do not exist that are sufficiently powerful to fully describe the TOWERING incompetence of these nauseatingly ignorant GIBBO trashcans!

https://www.bridgeba...S6%7Cmc%7C11%7C

[benellis58]

On the same hand discussed in post # 2529 immediately above, but at THREE (!) different tables, South declared 6NT DOUBLED...and MADE it! This, of course, could ONLY ever happen with GIBBO robots "defending"! They are the worst EVER! Here's the proof:

The human Souths steal a page from the bidding book of the repulsive GIBBO robots by making an undisciplined leap to 6NT.

West leads the heart 10. Declarer South pitches a diamond from dummy North, as East plays his heart deuce and South wins his ace.

At trick two, declarer leads his club queen, which is ducked all around.

At trick three, declarer continues with his club 7 to West's 10 and dummy's king. East wins his ace.

East is the "defender" who doubled 6NT...perhaps because he has...TWO ACES!

He is now on lead at trick four. Does he cash his diamond ace and immediately defeat the doubled slam?

Sorry, silly question. Of COURSE he doesn't. HE'S a GIBBO robot, so HE plays the 3 of hearts (!) and...declarer soon CLAIMS 12 tricks.

If ANYONE is STILL so naive and so blinkered that they STILL claim that GIBBO robots are "better than most human players", the only thing I can say to them is..."WHAT???????"


https://www.bridgeba...D8%7Cmc%7C12%7C

[benellis58]

There is one...and ONLY one...unbid suit. East has FIVE cards in that suit. Does he lead it against 2NT?

Of COURSE he doesn't. HE'S a GIBBO robot, so HE much prefers to lead the 8 of clubs (the suit that South OPENED) from his worthless 83 doubleton.

Declarer takes the first TEN tricks, despite being off five TOP tricks.

But by ALL means, o ye apologists for and defenders of GIBBO robots (if ANY of you still exist), PLEASE remind me of how your beloved GIBBO robots are "better than most human players". PLEASE remind me, because for some strange, inexplicable reason I seem to be forgetting that important point.

https://www.bridgeba...SK%7Cpc%7CD3%7C

[benellis58]

West wins his diamond ace at trick three. TYPICALLY, he IMMEDIATELY returns a DIAMOND.

I've seen bowls of beef stew that possess more intelligence than these GIBBO dimwits.

https://www.bridgeba...C9%7Cmc%7C10%7C

[benellis58]

North leads a diamond. A DIAMOND! That says it ALL.

https://www.bridgeba...CK%7Cpc%7CCA%7C

[benellis58]

Truly WRETCHED...declarer play (!) by the GIBBO knucklehead in the East.

Hey! What happened? I thought that declarer play was the pride and joy of GIBBO, the ONE area of bridge where they had at least a TINY bit of...if you'll pardon the expression..."ability".

Good grief, but these GIBBO robots are the most useless and hopeless "bridge players" of all time! In fact, they just might be the most hopeless of all time at ANY endeavour in ANY field. If I ever see a BAKER wearing a GIBBO HAT, you can bet your last dollar that I will NEVER risk taking even a NIBBLE of his bread!

https://www.bridgeba...CD7%7Cmc%7C6%7C

[benellis58]

"Oh," says North, a cursed GIBBO robot, "so declarer West has spades and diamonds? Well then, by gosh, I better lead a SPADE...INTO him, uh huh, uh huh."

https://www.bridgeba...C9%7Cpc%7CD9%7C

[benellis58]

North has a club lead staring him in the face but - ignorant GIBBO dirtbag that he is - he tables the spade jack. How is it even possible for anyone or anything to be as consistently bad as these GIB/GIBBO pieces of trash? Were they PURPOSELY designed to be the worst "bridge players" ever?

https://www.bridgeba...DJ%7Cpc%7CH2%7C

[benellis58]

East-West double me in 5C. They have THREE...TOP...TRICKS.

They cash TWO of them on the fly. They COULD cash the third at trick three, but they opt not to.

No problem, though, as I still "can't" make the contract, because I need ELEVEN tricks but only have ten.

I only have ten, that is, UNTIL East pitches enough hearts (!!!!!) that I score THREE (!!!!!) heart tricks from A6 dub in my hand opposite K1084 in dummy. And no, there was not some MIRACLE position with the enemy queen and jack of hearts. East had FIVE of them (QJ932!) BEHIND (!) dummy's K1084 (!), but decided that the best thing he could POSSIBLY do would be to pitch down to a stiff queen!

As an added bonus, note that East's spades are the 532, and that when West leads the spade king at trick one, East follows...INCORRECTLY...with the FIVE. The piece of GIBBO trash can't even get a simple, elementary thing like THAT right. A raw BEGINNER would INSTINCTIVELY get it right, but "Ginsberg's 'Intelligent' (!!!!!) Bridgeplayer" (sic!) can't!

When these GIBBO monstrosities go to that robot graveyard in the sky, I really hope that a scientific analysis is done on their "brains" so that this ASTOUNDING level of PERPETUAL stupidity NEVER again POLLUTES the Earth!

https://www.bridgeba...D4%7Cpc%7CDA%7C

[benellis58]

Here's a hand that - like just about EVERY hand - shows what remarkable I.D.I.O.T.S. all GIBBO robots are. They all suck pumice. They all stink.

Despite the typically pathetic GIB definitions, South's auction has shown longer clubs than spades, and at least six clubs and five spades...yet North, with FOUR good clubs and ONLY two spades, merrily bids 4S, opting for a likely SEVEN-card fit, rather than a KNOWN fit of at least TEN cards. Granted, spades IS a higher-scoring strain than clubs, AND he can bid spades at the FOUR level whereas he would have to bid clubs at the FIVE level, but the call is still at least questionable. North is also disobeying his own GIB definition, since it claims to show "3+ spades".

The 4S call happened to work out very well on THIS random hand, since the layout was EXTREMELY favourable for NS: spades 3-3 with the queen onside. West, meanwhile, made the type of incredibly stupid lead that the sickening GIBBO robots specialize in. The clueless doofus led a ...club. These GIBBO bozos are WELL beyond hope. They rot. They constantly rot. They consistently rot. They are the worst. They belong in a landfill, a trash compacter, a watery grave at the bottom of the sea, or a one-way rocket to Jupiter. They do NOT belong anywhere NEAR a bridge game, because they pollute any and every bridge game that they soil by their very presence.

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/yckrty6k

[benellis58]

North shows his total lack of logic, his complete absence of anything remotely approaching intelligence, and his twisted, bizarre, perverse way of looking at things. Like all GIBBO robots, he is as useless and pathetic a "bridge player" as has EVER existed. All GIBBO robots are nothing but stinking garbage.

South's 3H bid is defined by GIB as showing "4+ hearts" and "5+ spades", yet the disgusting piece of GIBBO dirt in the North LEAPS to four...SPADES (!!!) over South's 3H...despite holding FIVE (!) hearts and ONLY three spades (the FEWEST spades he could POSSIBLY have, given his earlier 3D bid).

In case I have not made my opinion of GIB/GIBBO clear, I will clarify it in the politest way I can HONESTLY state it: I have nothing but complete and total contempt for GIB/GIBBO. It has a wretched system, pathetic definitions, and the worst "bridge players" (namely the nauseating GIBBO pieces of dirt) that I have EVER seen in my many decades of bridge play. GIB/GIBBO is an embarrassment to bridge and a humiliating stain on BBO. GIB/GIBBO rots. It is a complete failure. In 2026, DECENT robots DO exist. GIB/GIBBO is NOT decent, not even CLOSE!

https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/mrykveke

[benellis58]

As is so often the case, ONE hand provides SEVERAL examples of GIB/GIBBO insanity. No surprise. Garbage will always be garbage, and GIB/GIBBO is garbage of the foulest sort.

It's not clear that North's responsive double, as opposed to bidding spades, is his best choice, but we won't dwell on that issue, because far worse things are about to occur.

South's 4C is (pathetically, as always) defined by GIB as "5+ clubs; 17+ HCP". A mere two statements...BOTH of which are I.D.I.O.T.I.C. (a GIB specialty). Why the HELL, Mr. GIB, must South have at least five clubs, and why the HELL, Mr. GIB, must he have at least 17 HCP? Since you probably cannot figure this out for yourself, Mr. GIB, allow me to explain. Unless South was prepared to pass and convert the responsive double for penalties (which admittedly would have worked out well!), he had to bid something, so 4C (or 4D) does NOT promise a five-bagger and does NOT promise extra HCP. In other words, Mr. GIB, your pathetic definition is total garbage, just like it usually is.

North now STUPIDLY bids Blackwood for clubs. The GIB definition for this imbecilic bid claims that it shows "15+ total points". Where the Hell are they, Mr. GIB? I see a mere NINE (!) HCP, and even if we very generously add a full THREE for distribution, that still brings us to ONLY twelve total points...a full THREE (!) fewer than the minimum of 15 promised by your own definition! Perhaps you have a valid excuse...in that you have proven time and time again that you have absolutely NO comprehension whatsoever about "total" points. Ignorance is your best excuse, which is a pretty SAD commentary on GIB and GIBBO!

South's 5C response to Blackwood correctly (at least in the hopelessly antiquated and vastly inferior Blackwood response structure that GIBBO foists on its innocent victims) states that it shows "zero or three key cards". Bravo, Mr. GIB! At least you got ONE thing right. Good work! But then, sigh, but then, the definition NEEDLESSLY continues by repeating the incorrect information about "5+ clubs" and "17+ HCP". That was WRONG the first time you said it, Mr. GIB, and it's still wrong! Only now it's even worse, because A. It's redundant, having already been stated before, and B. It's irrelevant to the question that North asked, which ONLY inquired about key cards.

North stupidly raises to 6C, without having a CLUE about whether the contract will be a decent one. Notably, the C.R.E.T.I.N. is doing this despite his own GIB definition telling him (for the SECOND time) that he is promising "15+ total points"...when he is not even CLOSE to that.

The contract has no play and duly goes one down, but our parade of I.D.I.O.C.Y. is not finished. East overtakes West's heart lead to win and shift to a diamond at trick two. Okay, fine...EXCEPT that the M.O.R.O.N. cannot even manage to shift to the correct diamond. From 1095 tripleton, the slack-jawed twit shifts to the NINE, the ONE diamond of the three that is clearly wrong. It was irrelevant here, but it shows that these useless GIBBO prunes can't get even the simplest, most basic things right. GIB/GIBBO is a gross, hideous, disgusting pimple on the face of bridge. GIB/GIBBO constantly rots. GIB/GIBBO is the worst.

https://www.bridgeba...H3%7Cmc%7C11%7C