We got a bottom letting their 2♠ made because everyone else played in ♦.
We use Standard American so 1♦ suggests 4 ♦s with the exception of 4=4=3=2. Who's fault missing our 9-card fit?
Posted 2021-October-21, 15:52
Posted 2021-October-21, 16:15
Posted 2021-October-21, 17:21
Posted 2021-October-21, 18:49
Posted 2021-October-21, 22:06
Posted 2021-October-22, 00:20
Posted 2021-October-22, 01:38
Posted 2021-October-22, 02:32
Posted 2021-October-22, 02:42
Posted 2021-October-22, 02:47
Posted 2021-October-22, 03:07
mw64ahw, on 2021-October-22, 02:47, said:
Posted 2021-October-22, 04:26
DavidKok, on 2021-October-22, 03:07, said:
Posted 2021-October-22, 14:42
Posted 2021-October-23, 04:42
Posted 2021-October-24, 02:55
bgm, on 2021-October-23, 04:42, said:
Posted 2021-October-24, 21:12
Posted 2021-October-25, 09:15
+++++++++++++++++++
Good problem, mikl_plkcc. After East's 1♠ overcall, for South, I rank
1. 2♦ = NAT. Underbid but lead-directional.
2. 1N = NAT. But the singleton ♥Q is a draw-back.
3. Pass = NAT Prefer ♥ and ♦ holdings reversed.
4. 2♣ = F/1 Overbid, and not the desired lead.
After West's raise to 2♠, for North, I rank
1. X = T/O Weak in high cards but typical shape for this call.
2. Pass = NAT. (But timid, IMO).