[blackshoe]

Cyberyeti, on 2019-November-15, 16:47, said:

EW have not been damaged by the MI if W gets his bid back, I don't believe anything else will change with the correct explanation, so if W passes, that's now his problem.

Not the point I was addressing.

[Cyberyeti]

blackshoe, on 2019-November-16, 09:55, said:

Not the point I was addressing.

Then quote the one you're addressing so I have a clue what it is.

[blackshoe]

sanst, on 2019-November-15, 13:00, said:

I don’t think so. But you can take away any advantage from NS which resulted from the infractions. I still don’t see that they actually gained through the MI, neither that EW were disadvantaged by it. The bad result is completely of their own making. If W has been given the opportunity to change the pass and declined to do so, their case becomes even worse. Here we certainly are in the serious error department.

This one.

[barmar]

"extremely serious error" means things like revokes and leads out of turn, forgetting that someone has shown out of a suit, and maybe losing count of a suit. Mistakes in judgement would rarely be considered extremely serious.