Matchpoints. What do you bid?
				
						#2
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-16, 15:02
But opps rate to have at least a 10-card club fit, so you are worth competing to at least 3H (not an option in your poll ☺).
				
						#5
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-16, 23:52
 nige1, on 2016-April-16, 22:21, said:
nige1, on 2016-April-16, 22:21, said:
A sensible requirement for a Michaels cue bid is:
Adequate high-card strength, honour-concentration, suit-length and suit-quality, to encourage partner to compete to the game-level, at least, when he has 4-card support for one of your suits.
Not vul this can be as little as
♠ Q J x x x ♥ Q J x x x ♦ x ♣ x x
Here, assuming that partner is just showing the majors, I rank
- 2N = ASK, preparatory to slam-try,
- 4♥ = S/O.
- 3♦ = NAT F1.
- 5♦ = NAT.
- 2♦ = NAT
				
						#6
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-17, 00:33
 Tramticket, on 2016-April-16, 15:02, said:
Tramticket, on 2016-April-16, 15:02, said:
But opps rate to have at least a 10-card club fit, so you are worth competing to at least 3H (not an option in your poll ☺).
My problem with this is... IS it a Michaels bid(?) I'm of the old school where a direct cue bid of the
enemy suit showed a rock crusher of a hand equivlant of a 2♣opener and forcing to at least Game.
It gravitates back to the old chestnut of partnership agreement.
- Dr Tarrasch(1862-1934)German Chess Grandmaster
Bridge is a game where you have two opponents...and often three(!)
"Any palooka can take tricks with Aces and Kings; the true expert shows his prowess
by how he handles the two's and three's" - Mollo's Hideous Hog
				
						#7
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-17, 00:54
				
						#8
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-17, 01:38
				
						#9
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-17, 06:08
 PhilG007, on 2016-April-17, 00:33, said:
PhilG007, on 2016-April-17, 00:33, said:
Of course it's Michaels. The OP shows it as 5/5 Majors.
 
						
						
				
						#12
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-17, 08:23
 wank, on 2016-April-17, 07:26, said:
wank, on 2016-April-17, 07:26, said:
Your bad manners are exceeded only by your bad manners. This game doesn't revolve around you alone
although you might like to think so(!)
 
						
						- Dr Tarrasch(1862-1934)German Chess Grandmaster
Bridge is a game where you have two opponents...and often three(!)
"Any palooka can take tricks with Aces and Kings; the true expert shows his prowess
by how he handles the two's and three's" - Mollo's Hideous Hog
				
						#13
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-17, 12:38
				
						#14
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-17, 12:54
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
				
						#15
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-17, 12:56
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
				
						#16
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-17, 12:57
 PhilG007, on 2016-April-17, 00:33, said:
PhilG007, on 2016-April-17, 00:33, said:
enemy suit showed a rock crusher of a hand equivlant of a 2♣opener and forcing to at least Game.
It gravitates back to the old chestnut of partnership agreement.
Don't be a troll please.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
				
						#17
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-17, 14:01
I also know that diamonds are going to be trump on this deal unless they are playing 6Cx. You see, when you play with me there is a special name given to my strong 8 card suits: TRUMPS!
				
						#18
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-18, 00:56
- Dr Tarrasch(1862-1934)German Chess Grandmaster
Bridge is a game where you have two opponents...and often three(!)
"Any palooka can take tricks with Aces and Kings; the true expert shows his prowess
by how he handles the two's and three's" - Mollo's Hideous Hog
				
						#19
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-18, 06:19
 wank, on 2016-April-17, 07:26, said:
wank, on 2016-April-17, 07:26, said:
You have far too much faith in human intelligence.
IMO Hanlon's razor applies here.
-gwnn
				
						#20
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2016-April-18, 14:00
First of all, I want to be in game, I am not sure, if 5D has better odds
than 4H.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)

 Help
 Help


A sensible requirement for a Michaels cue-bid is:
Adequate high-card strength, honour-concentration, suit-length and suit-quality, to encourage partner to compete to the game-level, at least, when he has 4-card support for one of your suits.
Not vul this can be as little as
♠ Q J x x x ♥ Q J x x x ♦ x ♣ x x
Here, assuming that partner is just showing the majors, I rank