Neither table found the top spot.
Our auction:
3♣ suggests some extras (we play good-bad 2N).
The other table went
1♣[16+] (P) 1♦[0-8] (X)
P[19+] (3♦) 3♠ (P)
4♣ (P) 5♣ (AP)
so that was 5imps in.
Posted 2015-July-25, 15:46
Posted 2015-July-25, 17:08
Posted 2015-July-25, 19:39
Posted 2015-July-25, 20:43
steve2005, on 2015-July-25, 19:39, said:
Posted 2015-July-25, 21:20
Posted 2015-July-25, 22:47
Posted 2015-July-26, 07:37
Posted 2015-July-26, 07:46
rhelle, on 2015-July-26, 07:37, said:
Posted 2015-July-26, 09:09
antonylee, on 2015-July-25, 15:46, said:
Posted 2015-July-26, 09:16
rhelle, on 2015-July-26, 07:37, said:
Posted 2015-July-26, 09:24
Posted 2015-July-26, 15:00
zillahandp, on 2015-July-26, 09:24, said:
On the actual hands, game is poor.
If your bidding methods can find out why -- then good for you -- and you should stay out of it,
Otherwise, with 24 combined HCP, it seems pusillanimous to try to stop on a sixpence at the 3-level (which might not be safe, anyway).
I think you should struggle to game, preferably 4♥, and hope for the best.