BBO Discussion Forums: a question on doubling - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

a question on doubling doubling

#1 User is offline   karlabsl 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 2013-July-23

Posted 2015-January-30, 12:22

As best as I remember... my RHO bid 1 . I had 4 hearts A, Q, xx., 3 spades xxx, 4 clubs K, xxx. And 2 diamonds, A x. I doubled.
My LHO bid 1
My partner had 6 spades, A, xxxxx. 2 xx, 4Axxx, 1 the jack

She doubled. Was that correct? I was supposed to know that was penalty? And my LHO took her bid? I thought my p had 4 hearts.
0

#2 User is offline   kuhchung 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 729
  • Joined: 2010-August-03

Posted 2015-January-30, 12:28

View Postkarlabsl, on 2015-January-30, 12:22, said:

As best as I remember... my RHO bid 1.

I doubled with xxx AQxx Ax Kxxx.

My LHO bid 1

My partner had Axxxxx xx J Axxx.

She doubled. Was that correct? I was supposed to know that was penalty? And my LHO took her bid? I thought my p had 4 hearts.

Videos of the worst bridge player ever playing bridge:
https://www.youtube....hungPlaysBridge
0

#3 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2015-January-30, 12:41

The old style was that

1-x-1-x =penalty, 4 spades.
             2=natural, 5 spades

I recently heard, though, that more and more experts go back to play X as four hearts, just like you said. Originally, responders used to psyche these bids with hands like

xx
xxxx
Axxxxx
x

assuming that opponents have a big spade fit and trying to convince them that they don't. Against these people, penalty doubles would come in very handy, and you could even differentiate between 4- and 5-card suits, something you cannot do if had gone, say, 1-x-3-?? But since so many people switched to penalty doubles, people stopped psyching these bids and now people wonder if it's not better to differentiate between heart length instead (x=4 hearts, 2=5 hearts). The logical question is then, will people start going back to psyching, causing a resurgence of penalty doubles? Time will tell.

With your partner's hand I'd just bid 4 spades. It's what I'd bid without the 1 bid, it is what I'll bid now. It is probably a decent contract even with spades 4-0 (I did not look at partner's hand yet).

edit: now I did look at partner's hand, and I see that it would be a hopeless contract with spades 4-0, but I also see that spades are very likely not 4-0 since they have a lot of diamonds :)
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#4 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2015-January-30, 17:06

There are times we really really REALLY want something to be a penalty double. Over
the long run the take out meaning will carry much more weight. Sure we will miss some
phantom penalties (are the opps really going to play 1sx (hugely doubtful) but by using the
much more (likely to occur) :negative: meaning we can help differentiate between our major
suit replies much more accurately.

The take out xer does not have to have spades they could be on their way to a wide variety
of contracts. the 1s bid can be natural in which case our playing in spades could be in
serious jeopardy but the real reason the :negative: meaning will normally work better is that
the 1s bid is forcing and we will almost always get a later opportunity to show our spade suit.

Pass for now and see how the bidding develops.
0

#5 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2015-January-31, 01:52

The double of 1S is still for penalties in most of the world so double is OK in that sense.
Usually double shows four spades, with 5 or 6 just bid 2S, 3S or 4S. However if partner really has no spade pips it might have worked better to double and then bid spades to show more high cards and less good spades.
0

#6 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2015-January-31, 13:13

View Postkarlabsl, on 2015-January-30, 12:22, said:

I had x x x A Q x x A x K x x x
My partner had A x x x x x x x J A x x x
(1) Double (1) Double
Was her double correct?
Without special agreement, partner's double usually shows 4 . IMO, It's OK for her to have more . It's also OK to agree to play it as T/O, instead.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users