BBO Discussion Forums: checking - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

checking

#1 User is offline   Bad_Wolf 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 97
  • Joined: 2011-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hawke's Bay New Zealand
  • Interests:Mathematics, history.

Posted 2014-March-24, 22:20

MPS

0

#2 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2014-March-24, 23:27

4♠.
0

#3 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2014-March-25, 01:10

no bid. don't feel like turning +100 into -800.
0

#4 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2014-March-25, 04:51

4♠ for sure.
0

#5 User is offline   WellSpyder 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,627
  • Joined: 2009-November-30
  • Location:Oxfordshire, England

Posted 2014-March-25, 05:57

View Postwank, on 2014-March-25, 01:10, said:

no bid. don't feel like turning +100 into -800.


View PostPhilKing, on 2014-March-25, 04:51, said:

4♠ for sure.

Are you two still playing together? :)

FWIW, I'm with Phil on this one, though I can easily see it having the result wank suggests.
0

#6 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2014-March-25, 06:46

View PostWellSpyder, on 2014-March-25, 05:57, said:

Are you two still playing together? :)

FWIW, I'm with Phil on this one, though I can easily see it having the result wank suggests.


Well, if he had access to my database he might change his mind.
0

#7 User is offline   Lord Molyb 

  • Slightly less bad player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 964
  • Joined: 2012-October-16
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Bridge

Posted 2014-March-25, 07:15

I think I'm using the same database as PhilKing.
It was an obvious pass before I ran simulations, now it's an obvious 4♠.

Partner has 3-4 spades and a singleton/void heart a surprising amount of the time and we can often make 4♠ opposite a low doubleton or honor singleton. When we can't make 4♠ they are almost always making 4♥.
Become yourself.
0

#8 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2014-March-25, 09:15

View PostBad_Wolf, on 2014-March-24, 22:20, said:

MPS
IMO 4♠ = 10, Pass = 9, Double = 4. A toss-up. Wank may well be right, taking into account partner's silence and your 3 ♥s
Guthrie.tech
0

#9 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2014-March-25, 09:41

Did these databases eliminate all hands with which CHO doubles in direct seat?

My simtuition went with Wank, but my expectation of the forum replies went with Phil.

LOL at myself, I just noticed my tagline.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
1

#10 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2014-March-25, 14:27

I would bid 4♠ and complete the transfer. Posted Image
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
0

#11 User is online   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,013
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2014-March-25, 14:32

4♠. If it's 'wrong', the 800 will be a push, and maybe I'll play it a trick better and win 7 :P
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#12 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2014-March-25, 14:49

View Postaguahombre, on 2014-March-25, 09:41, said:

Did these databases eliminate all hands with which CHO doubles in direct seat?

My simtuition went with Wank, but my expectation of the forum replies went with Phil.

LOL at myself, I just noticed my tagline.


The database shows what happened when the auciton actually occurred at the table.
0

#13 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2014-March-26, 09:35

4s

For ONCE I actually have a suit with quality. Having trump suit
quality is the number one way to keep from getting x. This fact alone
virtually eliminates any chance of going for 800 and thus reducing
risk significantly.

The second factor in favor of a 4s bid is that p rates to have
an average of 9 hcp and if p has that 9 we have a great chance at
making game so on average we will make a vul game. Seems like risk
vs reward favors bidding
0

#14 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2014-March-26, 11:21

View Postgszes, on 2014-March-26, 09:35, said:

4s

For ONCE I actually have a suit with quality. Having trump suit
quality is the number one way to keep from getting x. This fact alone
virtually eliminates any chance of going for 800 and thus reducing
risk significantly.

The second factor in favor of a 4s bid is that p rates to have
an average of 9 hcp and if p has that 9 we have a great chance at
making game so on average we will make a vul game. Seems like risk
vs reward favors bidding

I have to agree with your thoughts here.
0

#15 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,765
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2014-March-26, 22:18

I think they can make 4♥ more often than we can make 4♠. I hope one can make so I bid 4♠. If it is 4♥ making then I hope 4♠ is a decent dive.

Its not all roses though. 4♠ might be too costly at these colours and we may simply create a problem, for partner, when the opponents compete to 5♥.
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#16 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2014-March-27, 02:41

If LHO open 4♠ I would bid 5 of my suit.
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users