blackshoe, on 2014-February-10, 19:31, said:
Okay, Nigel, I'll play. Show me how to word the comment so it has no "dismissive tone". That's one thing. The other is that you're certainly entitled to disagree, but you're still wrong. ![;)](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
![;)](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
![:(](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)
I think we should try to avoid attacks on individuals. But organisations (like the WBF, ACBL, and EBU, or large groups (like professionals, directors or law-makers) are legitimate targets for reasoned criticism in discussions of Bridge Law. What Blackshoe took as a slur on directors was intended as a criticism of the laws. I accept that I may be wrong. I agree with Blackshoe that we're free to differ.
![:)](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)