BBO Discussion Forums: Offensive - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Offensive

#21 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2013-April-02, 19:34

View Postnige1, on 2013-April-02, 18:05, said:



  • After 1♥ (_P) 2♦ (4♠); _X (_P) ??: IMO 5♦ = 10, 5♥ = 9, _P = 7.



Bro...i know you have your own style of giving scores to bids that i may or not agree with, but.... I mean your pd opens 1♥, a major suit, you have AJxx support and you started 2♦, followed by LHO bidding 4♠, would you really hide that suit the second time and bid your 7 card suit, which by the way as decent suit as Kxxxxxx only ? Really ?

And you are giving it a 10 ? To me 5♦ should not even be in the poll, let alone having the top score. Can you explain me what i have been missing ?
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#22 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2013-April-02, 19:44

View PostPhil, on 2013-April-02, 16:57, said:

I was given this hand by someone I did not realize hangs out at 2+2.


We are everywhere.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#23 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2013-April-03, 08:01

View PostMrAce, on 2013-April-02, 19:34, said:

Bro...i know you have your own style of giving scores to bids that i may or not agree with, but.... I mean your pd opens 1♥, a major suit, you have AJxx support and you started 2♦, followed by LHO bidding 4♠, would you really hide that suit the second time and bid your 7 card suit, which by the way as decent suit as Kxxxxxx only ? Really ? And you are giving it a 10 ? To me 5♦ should not even be in the poll, let alone having the top score. Can you explain me what i have been missing ?
Controversial I admit and I could easily be persuaded otherwise. My fuzzy logic FWIW, was ....
  • The game-forcing 2♦ reply was an overbid. (Mr Ace and some of my partners might choose it, hence the reluctant 8 marks).
  • If you continue with 5♥ over 4♠, opener may expect a better hand (what an Acol player would term a delayed game raise or better).
  • If you bid 5♦ over 4♠, you might argue No double no trouble.
  • 5♦ may be playable. It may even be safer than 5♥ e..g. opposite ♠ x x x x ♥ K Q x x x ♦ Q J ♣ A x
  • If opponents belong in a higher ♠ contract, they may be reluctant to bid on, unaware of our double fit.
  • If (as is more likely) 5♦ is doubled, you can correct to 5♥ without promising the earth.
  • Of course, passing 4♠X may be the lesser risk.
Wyman posed an interesting problem, and this may have brought Mr Ace back into the debate :)
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users