Accidentally pulling the 2♥ call instead of 2♦ at matchpoints. What now?
You pulled the wrong card.
#1
Posted 2013-February-26, 07:11
Accidentally pulling the 2♥ call instead of 2♦ at matchpoints. What now?
#2
Posted 2013-February-26, 07:18
#3
Posted 2013-February-26, 07:31
-gwnn
#4
Posted 2013-February-26, 07:36
#5
Posted 2013-February-26, 07:48
But 6 ♦ is still a huge bid. I try X and 3 NT over the obvious 3 ♥ from partner.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#6
Posted 2013-February-26, 07:58
mcphee, on 2013-February-26, 07:36, said:
Won't it be rather difficult to persuade partner that 4N isn't Blackwood when you supported hearts earlier? Of course partner will be a bit confused as to why you now apparently have enough to enquire about slam when earlier you could only raise 1 to 2. But since you first bid an impossible 3N and that didn't shut him up, he's already got used to the idea you have a lot more than you promised to start with.
It's quite an interesting case because of hte light it sheds on some other legal cases. Often a player makes an "impossible bid" after previously misexplaining or misalerting one of partner's bids, thus partner has unauthorised information (UI) as to what is going on. Often people then say "but it is an impossible bid so the UI told me the same as the auction, so I know it anyway." But here we see a player considering making an impossible bid not from a misunderstanding, but because of an earlier mistake, thus demonstrating that earlier mistakes are also a possible reason for "impossible" bids.
As to the actual bidding problem, I don't think there is a reliable way of stopping partner from repeating hearts short of calling 7N. I think the first attempt might be "pass": partner might still continue bidding hearts, but he at least have plausible options to pass or double, so that seems to have some higher probability of avoiding ending up in a high heart contract.
#7
Posted 2013-February-26, 10:13
Agree again with Wank that 6D is the way to unring the bell, hoping for the Meta to kick in about "when partner leaps to slam, pass."
#8
Posted 2013-February-26, 10:44
aguahombre, on 2013-February-26, 10:13, said:
Yeah and my position is to stay out of committee but not the loony bin.
I'm tempted to go straight to 6nt to hide my ass....ets.
If rho plays like I do that a double just requests a non-spade lead good luck to figuring out that it's for a heart
What is baby oil made of?
#10
Posted 2013-February-26, 13:45
Had this come up at the regional last weekend, and someone mentioned you could do this.
I'm not sure what I'm going to do here. I think the only action I can take that partner wont correct back to hearts is 6NT lol (would he really bid 7H over that?). So I guess I'd bid that. Maybe better is blackwood then correct to a NT slam. What are my ethical obligations (if there are any)?
#11
Posted 2013-February-26, 13:56
dustinst22, on 2013-February-26, 13:45, said:
Had this come up at the regional last weekend, and someone mentioned you could do this.
I'm not sure what I'm going to do here. I think the only action I can take that partner wont correct back to hearts is 6NT lol (would he really bid 7H over that?). So I guess I'd bid that.
It is my understanding that a mechanical error (pulling the wrong bid card) can be corrected before the next player takes an action. In fact, it might be correctable even later (perhaps after a pass by LHO but before partner acts), but I am less sure of this.
#12
Posted 2013-February-26, 14:51
mcphee, on 2013-February-26, 07:36, said:
This sounds nice in practice, but partner isn't passing 3N since you will trigger his flight mechanism.
6♦ sounds really sensible to me. If partner bids 6♥ this is a wtp 6N bid.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#13
Posted 2013-February-26, 15:07
#14
Posted 2013-February-26, 15:24
ArtK78, on 2013-February-26, 13:56, said:
Let's assume OP knew that.
#15
Posted 2013-February-26, 15:54
JLOGIC, on 2013-February-26, 15:07, said:
I didn't go all bizzaro (albeit by accident) to aim for an average. A sense of justice says bottom but I laugh at fate, ha ha! and go for the top.
This auction has no legs in the bar if it ends in a par contract.
What is baby oil made of?
#16
Posted 2013-February-27, 02:21
ArtK78, on 2013-February-26, 13:56, said:
A mechanical error or other unintended bid can be corrected until partner calls, but you must begin your attempt to correct it immediately you become aware of it. Calling the director, or saying "that's not what I thought I pulled out", is an appropriate method of beginning your attempt to correct it. If you were perfectly aware you were bidding 2H at the time you bid 2H, that is not a mechanical error or unintended bid, it is a mistake, and is not capable of correction. If your LHO has already called (or for that matter, a call out of turn by your RHO) after your unintended bid, then they get to withdraw their call for free after you have changed yours, and knowledge of the withdrawn call is unauthorised to you, but authorised to them.
#17
Posted 2013-February-27, 09:52
ArtK78, on 2013-February-26, 13:56, said:
This is really LOL. If you do not have a Lawbook, and do not know how to access one online, why answer? Do you feel that your thoughts on the matter are more helpful than the published law dealing with the matter?
#18
Posted 2013-February-27, 09:53
iviehoff, on 2013-February-27, 02:21, said:
It is worth noting that it doesn't matter how you found out that you made an unintended bid; it is permitted for partner's alert, lack of alert, or explanation to wake you up.
#19
Posted 2013-February-27, 10:03
iviehoff, on 2013-February-27, 02:21, said:
Are you sure about this ivie? I think calling the Director is always an appropriate way of dealing with an irregularity. Is this not precisely what David preaches over and over in the Laws section? I would feel pretty peeved if you felt this violated my 9B1c rights. Exactly what is wrong with saying: "I would like to change my unintended call and therefore we need the TD." Do you really expect the players, who may not know what is or is not a legal change of call, to handle this without the TD?
#20
Posted 2013-February-27, 10:07
Legally trying to extricate one's self from a prior boo boo has always been interesting to me --having seen some clever attempts (successful and unsuccessful) over the years.

Help
