BBO Discussion Forums: Subtle differences - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Subtle differences Ways to show hearts over 3S

#1 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2012-June-13, 01:11

Opponents open 3 and remain silent thereafter:

1. (3)-X-4; 4

2. (3)-X-4; 5

3. (3)-4-4NT; 5

4. (3)-4NT-5; 5

5. (3)-5

What do you think these different auctions mean? Do some show a better hand than others? Do some ask for a spade control, others for trump quality, etc.?
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
1

#2 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2012-June-13, 05:24

Good question.

Somebody has to break the stunned silence, so I'll have a go. I'm going to assume that
- 4m is forcing NLM, and includes all slam-try two suiters with hearts
- 4 is ostensibly both minors and not a slam try
- 4NT is a slam try with both minors

1. (3)-X-4; 4
A flexible game-going hand with five hearts

2. (3)-X-4; 5
A flexible hand with six hearts and slam interest.

3. (3)-4-4NT; 5
A one-suited slam try with a spade control.

4. (3)-4NT-5; 5
A cue-bid for clubs.

5. (3)-5
A one-suited slam try that lacks a spade control.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#3 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-June-13, 10:05

View Postgnasher, on 2012-June-13, 05:24, said:

3. (3)-4-4NT; 5
A one-suited slam try with a spade control.

This one is interesting, and dovetails onto another active thread.

Gnasher's answer still works. Partner was probably expecting a big Heart/minor 2-suiter with her 4NT ask, but we don't care and our "break" does show what Gnasher says it shows.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#4 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2012-June-13, 10:34

I don't think its necessary to use NLM in these sequences.

A cue of 4 is generally a big + minor hand. 5 should be p/c, and 4N should be a slam going hand. Therefore, Auction 3 can simply be a hand too big to bid 5m, without being specific as to the minor, but showing extra heart length.

3 - 4N is ostensibly minors, but a pull to 5 should be single suited hearts, like many 4N for takeout auctions, instead of two places to play. I cannot see why someone would want to label this differently.

Auction 5 is interesting, and and the Katz / Capelli team had a misunderstanding with a similar auction (3) - 5 in a QF match of the senior trials against Robinson. One thought it was looking for a club control, and the other thought it was just a hand too good to overcall 4.

Under this criteria, 5 is the good single suited hand, which 3 is simply looking for a spade control.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#5 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-June-13, 12:43

I think 3S 4N 5C 5H is a cuebid. I don't think a 1 suiter in hearts can start with 4N.

I would have assumed 3S 4S was michaels, I guess it depends on whether you use NLM so please advise.

I would take 3S 5H as just too strong to bid 4H. I do not think a hand that is solid minus a spade control is at all important to show, I have never seen that hand type in real life.
0

#6 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2012-June-13, 16:03

View PostJLOGIC, on 2012-June-13, 12:43, said:

I do not think a hand that is solid minus a spade control is at all important to show, I have never seen that hand type in real life.

I agree, but I think it is useful to distinguish between a slam try with a spade control and a slam try without a spade control.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#7 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-June-13, 16:08

It is just very unlikely to have a slam try with no spade control over a 3S opener (even if its not a demand). You have 2 small spades and another loser, are you really not bidding 4H? Like xx AKQJxxx AQx A, I would just bid 4H even if I had a way to show a slam TRY and no spade control, call me crazy.
0

#8 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2012-June-13, 18:16

View Postaguahombre, on 2012-June-13, 10:05, said:

This one is interesting, and dovetails onto another active thread.

No, really? What a coincidence! ;)
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#9 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2012-June-13, 18:20

View PostPhil, on 2012-June-13, 10:34, said:

A cue of 4 is generally a big + minor hand. 5 should be p/c, and 4N should be a slam going hand. Therefore, Auction 3 can simply be a hand too big to bid 5m, without being specific as to the minor, but showing extra heart length.

I was trying to keep the number of sequences down but here's a bonus question for you:

6. (3)-4-5; 5

Would this hand have bid higher than 5 if the response had been 4NT?
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#10 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2012-June-13, 18:42

View Postmgoetze, on 2012-June-13, 18:20, said:

I was trying to keep the number of sequences down but here's a bonus question for you:

6. (3)-4-5; 5

Would this hand have bid higher than 5 if the response had been 4NT?


This is a 'how many angels can fit on the head of a pin' question.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#11 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-June-13, 19:35

I would take 4S (assuming hearts and a minor) followed by 5H as a very strong preference for hearts, maybe 7-5, and non forcing.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users