Subtle differences Ways to show hearts over 3S
#1
Posted 2012-June-13, 01:11
1. (3♠)-X-4♣; 4♥
2. (3♠)-X-4♣; 5♥
3. (3♠)-4♠-4NT; 5♥
4. (3♠)-4NT-5♣; 5♥
5. (3♠)-5♥
What do you think these different auctions mean? Do some show a better hand than others? Do some ask for a spade control, others for trump quality, etc.?
-- Bertrand Russell
#2
Posted 2012-June-13, 05:24
Somebody has to break the stunned silence, so I'll have a go. I'm going to assume that
- 4m is forcing NLM, and includes all slam-try two suiters with hearts
- 4♠ is ostensibly both minors and not a slam try
- 4NT is a slam try with both minors
1. (3♠)-X-4♣; 4♥
A flexible game-going hand with five hearts
2. (3♠)-X-4♣; 5♥
A flexible hand with six hearts and slam interest.
3. (3♠)-4♠-4NT; 5♥
A one-suited slam try with a spade control.
4. (3♠)-4NT-5♣; 5♥
A cue-bid for clubs.
5. (3♠)-5♥
A one-suited slam try that lacks a spade control.
#3
Posted 2012-June-13, 10:05
gnasher, on 2012-June-13, 05:24, said:
A one-suited slam try with a spade control.
This one is interesting, and dovetails onto another active thread.
Gnasher's answer still works. Partner was probably expecting a big Heart/minor 2-suiter with her 4NT ask, but we don't care and our "break" does show what Gnasher says it shows.
#4
Posted 2012-June-13, 10:34
A cue of 4♠ is generally a big ♥ + minor hand. 5♣ should be p/c, and 4N should be a slam going hand. Therefore, Auction 3 can simply be a hand too big to bid 5m, without being specific as to the minor, but showing extra heart length.
3♠ - 4N is ostensibly minors, but a pull to 5♥ should be single suited hearts, like many 4N for takeout auctions, instead of two places to play. I cannot see why someone would want to label this differently.
Auction 5 is interesting, and and the Katz / Capelli team had a misunderstanding with a similar auction (3♣) - 5♠ in a QF match of the senior trials against Robinson. One thought it was looking for a club control, and the other thought it was just a hand too good to overcall 4♠.
Under this criteria, 5 is the good single suited hand, which 3 is simply looking for a spade control.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#5
Posted 2012-June-13, 12:43
I would have assumed 3S 4S was michaels, I guess it depends on whether you use NLM so please advise.
I would take 3S 5H as just too strong to bid 4H. I do not think a hand that is solid minus a spade control is at all important to show, I have never seen that hand type in real life.
#6
Posted 2012-June-13, 16:03
JLOGIC, on 2012-June-13, 12:43, said:
I agree, but I think it is useful to distinguish between a slam try with a spade control and a slam try without a spade control.
#7
Posted 2012-June-13, 16:08
#8
Posted 2012-June-13, 18:16
aguahombre, on 2012-June-13, 10:05, said:
No, really? What a coincidence!

-- Bertrand Russell
#9
Posted 2012-June-13, 18:20
Phil, on 2012-June-13, 10:34, said:
I was trying to keep the number of sequences down but here's a bonus question for you:
6. (3♠)-4♠-5♣; 5♥
Would this hand have bid higher than 5♥ if the response had been 4NT?
-- Bertrand Russell
#10
Posted 2012-June-13, 18:42
mgoetze, on 2012-June-13, 18:20, said:
6. (3♠)-4♠-5♣; 5♥
Would this hand have bid higher than 5♥ if the response had been 4NT?
This is a 'how many angels can fit on the head of a pin' question.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#11
Posted 2012-June-13, 19:35