BBO Discussion Forums: How good are your agreements? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

How good are your agreements? Tough hand

Poll: After 4H P P what are the meanings of the following bids? (30 member(s) have cast votes)

5S

  1. General hand too strong for bidding 4S (13 votes [43.33%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 43.33%

  2. Slam try with no heart control (16 votes [53.33%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 53.33%

  3. Other (1 votes [3.33%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 3.33%

5H

  1. Strong S Single suiter with a heart control (6 votes [20.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  2. Strong two suited hand (17 votes [56.67%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 56.67%

  3. Strong three suited hand (3 votes [10.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

  4. Other (4 votes [13.33%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 13.33%

4N then 5S over 5m

  1. Slam try in spades (3 votes [10.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

  2. Slam try in spades with no heart control (1 votes [3.33%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 3.33%

  3. Slam try in spades and the other minor (16 votes [53.33%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 53.33%

  4. Other (7 votes [23.33%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 23.33%

  5. Doesnt exist. (3 votes [10.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   phil_20686 

  • Scotland
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,754
  • Joined: 2008-August-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 2011-December-29, 07:13

So the hand that gave rise to these questions was the following MP problem, red vs green you hold




What now?
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
0

#2 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-December-29, 08:36

I think that this is best, as well as being reasonably intuitive:
- 5 = one-suited slam try without a heart control
- 5 = spades + a minor, can stop in 5.
- 4NT then 5 = one-suited slam try with a heart control

In the only partnership where I've discussed this, we play something slightly different:
- 5 shows heart losers, so it could be either xx or Ax
- 4NT then 5 shows heart control and no slow heart losers, ie normally a singleton.
I think this is worse, because it might mean missing a slam with Ax opposite xx with the rest of the hand solid.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#3 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2011-December-29, 09:06

Let's see what I do know ( to eliminate from the choices ):

(4H) - ??
........... DBL = 3 suited T/O
............4NT! = minor 2-suiter ( at least 5/5 )
............4S/5C/5D = to play

So, I need bids for the following:
i ) strong Sp w/ Ht Ctrl .......I think I'd choose: 5H
ii) strong Sp w/o Ht Ctrl.......I think I'd choose: 5S
iii) strong 2-suiter: Sp/minor...I think I'd roll this one into the T/O DBL
After the DBL:
... this allows partner to bid 4S if that is best for him;
...or if partner bids 5m, then 5S by you would show Sp/other-minor 2-suiter.
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
1

#4 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2011-December-29, 09:08

View Postphil_20686, on 2011-December-29, 07:13, said:

So the hand that gave rise to these questions was the following MP problem, red vs green you hold




What now?

I would have to think about that for a long time. What should we do when we are short in partner's suit with all our values in the two suits shown on our right?

Whatever Partner does with that knowledge is up to her; but that is what I call an "informatory" double --different from its apparent original meaning.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#5 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2011-December-29, 09:40

6 now
0

#6 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2011-December-29, 13:54

I've posted elsewhere that I don't like having a lot of emphasis on whether or not I have a heart control as you need controls in all four suits, and 12 tricks, to make slam.
So I am confident that:

immediate 5S = hand too good for 4S
5H = big 2-suiter, spades and a minor (interesting discussion if 5S can be passed)
4NT then 5S = slam try in the minor partner just selected, without first round heart control

As for the actual hand, I was kibbitzing when this came up so I know what all four hands are. The auction at the table I was watching started the same way.
I think the correct action is a lot less obvious aquahombre's sarcasm suggests.

It depends quite a lot on who your RHO is (and if you know what 5S means).
At 'my' table, the 4H/6D bidder was Jallerton who is known as both a very good player and generally a sound/scientific type bidder (in 20+ years of playing with him I think I've only ever twice seen him pre-empt and then bid (not double) again on the next round). OBviously I don't know who Phil's opponents were!
0

#7 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2011-December-29, 16:14

Yes, Frances, I was being sarcastic. But that doesn't mean I was advocating a "stand up on the table" double. I just feel it is the best possible helpful description I can give partner.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#8 User is offline   dwar0123 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 770
  • Joined: 2011-September-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bellevue, WA

Posted 2011-December-29, 16:45

My non expert opinion.

If he was interested in your side suits, he would bid 4nt or double. He wants to know about the quality of your spades, specifically he wants the ace or king.

I would double now.

I feel like trying to decide which way of getting to 5s(direct or via 4nt) is asking about a heart stopper is biased on the fact we have the ace of hearts. I think it is unlikely we have the ace of hearts in this auction and wasting one of the few available bids we have asking about it is absurd. That we actually have it not withstanding. I picture partner with kqjxxxx x - akqxx or kqjxxxx - x akqxx or qj10xxxxx - - akqxx.
0

#9 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2011-December-29, 19:46

bid of opps suit at 5 level = 1 suited hand (any) exclusion blackwood
i.e. A void KQJT9xxx KQJT IMO after a bidding sequence like this p is a huge
favorite to have at least 1 minor ace so the gamble is worth it.


4n followed by (over minor suit bid) 5h = spades and other minor
4n followed by (5c 5d or 5h) 5s = single suited spades worried about spades ie
QJTxxxxxx void AKQ A p would step bid spade stuff
----P = none
----5n = Q or xxx(xx) 6c asks how many spades
--------6d = 1 or 2
--------6h = 3
--------6s = 4
----6c = stiff K
----6d = stiff A
----6h = Kx or Ax
----6s = Kxx or Axx
----6n = 2 of top 3 and 2 side aces (should be sufficient for 7n but let p bid it anyway)
----7c = 2 of top 3 and club A
----7d = 2 of top 3 and dia A
----7h = 2 of top 3 and heart A
----7s = 2 of top 3
5c to play range is so wide as to make slam exploration hazardous
5d to play range is so wide as to make slam exploration hazardous
5h exclusion blackwood single suited hand
5s spade slam try but no heart control
5n pick a slam 3 suited hand AKQx x AKQx AKQx (if we are too high ah well)
6c/6d/6s bid 7 with A or K in bid suit (it is our trump suit) AK void KQJT8765432 void
6h bid 7n with an ace else bid 6n AK KQ AK AKQJxxx
1

#10 User is offline   mikestar13 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 648
  • Joined: 2010-October-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Bernardino, CA USA

Posted 2011-December-30, 02:37

At match points, North should follow Kit Woolsey's advice and just bid 6 with a decent slam try and let them guess whether slam is hopeless, cold, or a tossup.But faced with the actual bidding, I would take it as asking for a heart control just like the more common cases of a voluntary 5M bid. (Voluntary=could have bid or passed 4M). Our agreement about V5M are as follows:
  • Control of the enemy suit , unless control has been previously shown.
  • If #1 does not apply, control of the only unbid suit.
  • If #2 does not apply, trump quality.
  • In the unlikely event that #3 does not apply (trump quality is already known), quantitative.
In the sequence ?-(4)-4NT-(P)-5m-(P)-5, this would be the next following item on the list--so in the hand in question, the direct 5 asks for a heart control, and going by 4NT would ask trump quality. There were two unbid suits ( the minor) when this approach would have been chosen, so #2 is inapplicable.)



1

#11 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-December-30, 07:54

Since 5S doesn't make any sense as preemptive, this probably has the classical meaning of "11 tricks and 2 trump losers". In that case I dbl 6D and dbl 6H afterwards.

Of course, pard might also have a doubleton heart and the nuts outside. You can't really tell, so... better assume the worse.

Fluffy's 6H is nice but it's gonna look silly if pard happens to have the classical hand :)
0

#12 User is offline   kayin801 

  • Modern Day Trebuchet Enthusiast
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 738
  • Joined: 2007-October-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Western Mass.

Posted 2011-December-30, 12:37

6 wdo if we score +1460 but I'd guess very few people are in 7=

Given that you can show most 2 suiters with 4NT or 5NT, I'm not sure what the difference between 5 and 5 should be, and I guess utility-wise one can show a heart control or no heart control, but it seems to be aiming for a pretty specific target on this auction. Maybe 5 should be just be a better hand while 5 sorta shuts us out.
I once yelled at my partner for discarding the 'wrong' card when he was subjected to a squeeze that I allowed by giving the wrong count with too high a card. Now he's allowed to pitch aces when the opponents have the king in the dummy. At trick 2. When he could have followed suit. And blame me.

East4Evil sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
1

#13 User is offline   Yu18772 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 466
  • Joined: 2010-August-31
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Los Angeles

Posted 2012-January-04, 00:58

Not that it matters much - but I menat 5H as strong two-suiter, not 3 suiter :)
Posted Image
Yehudit Hasin

"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
1

#14 User is offline   rhm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,092
  • Joined: 2005-June-27

Posted 2012-January-04, 04:56

View PostFrancesHinden, on 2011-December-29, 13:54, said:

I've posted elsewhere that I don't like having a lot of emphasis on whether or not I have a heart control as you need controls in all four suits, and 12 tricks, to make slam.
So I am confident that:

immediate 5S = hand too good for 4S

I agree completely. When opponents have preempted there is limited room showing different hand types and this type of hand is much more important and frequent than the very rare hands where the only issue is control, when partner's hand is completely unknown.

5 = any hand with control, likely a void, which wants to force to slam and which does not want to defend 4 doubled. However, a minor two-suiter would start with 4NT.

4NT then 5 = looking for a grand slam in the minor partner just selected.
4NT showed a minor two suiter (over 4) and I am not of the school where subsequent bids can cancel the meaning of previous ones.
5 shows first round control in both majors. How else can you invite a grand opposite a partner who has not promised anything?
Without first round control in simply raise to six.

Rainer Herrmann
1

#15 User is offline   xcurt 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 612
  • Joined: 2007-December-31
  • Location:Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Posted 2012-January-07, 21:28

My answer to "what is best?" is Frances agreement.

I think "standard" is what gnasher posted.

I'd double, but thats just because it's mps and:

* I expect LHO to go back to hearts, and so I can hear if partner doubles 6H or not, discouraging
* I expect RHO has at most one black card so splits will be awful
* I a strong believer in taking the plus at matchpoints

If the final contract is 6Hx I lead my ace.
"It is not enough to be a good player. You must also play well." -- Tarrasch
1

#16 User is offline   phil_20686 

  • Scotland
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,754
  • Joined: 2008-August-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 2012-January-09, 03:24

The other hands were:



Since this is cheap against game it was obviously a terrible MP score. Anecdotally, large fraction of the field bid 4S and was allowed to play there, so if you bid the slam and they sac you are still well below average.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
0

#17 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-January-09, 12:09

View Postphil_20686, on 2012-January-09, 03:24, said:

large fraction of the field bid 4S and was allowed to play there

O_o
0

#18 User is offline   xcurt 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 612
  • Joined: 2007-December-31
  • Location:Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Posted 2012-January-09, 16:23

You probably weren't winning this board anyway given that your side is supposed to bear par, and you were presumably playing against seeded opponents.

Also, note that if RHO had 1750 or 1660 with the same texture you can't make 6S. Therefore, even if you knew partner's hand over 6D, it isn't clear to bid.
"It is not enough to be a good player. You must also play well." -- Tarrasch
1

#19 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2012-January-13, 16:13

View Postphil_20686, on 2012-January-09, 03:24, said:


Since this is cheap against game it was obviously a terrible MP score. Anecdotally, large fraction of the field bid 4S and was allowed to play there, so if you bid the slam and they sac you are still well below average.


You don't need anecdotes, you can look up the results at http://www.ebu.co.uk...SwissPairs3.txt
Out of 73 tables, only 9 played in 4S, but quite a lot played in 5S
If they save in 7D and you take 500 you get only a 29% board as you say, but it's not at all clear they are going to bid 7D if you bid 6S
0

#20 User is offline   xcurt 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 612
  • Joined: 2007-December-31
  • Location:Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Posted 2012-January-13, 20:40

View PostFrancesHinden, on 2012-January-13, 16:13, said:

You don't need anecdotes, you can look up the results at http://www.ebu.co.uk...SwissPairs3.txt
Out of 73 tables, only 9 played in 4S, but quite a lot played in 5S
If they save in 7D and you take 500 you get only a 29% board as you say, but it's not at all clear they are going to bid 7D if you bid 6S


Nice recaps. Makes the ACBL look pathetic. What are they doing down there (besides building shiny new HQ)?
"It is not enough to be a good player. You must also play well." -- Tarrasch
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users