BBO Discussion Forums: ATB 2/1 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

ATB 2/1

#21 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-September-29, 09:59

I don't think 3NT showed anything clearly. 3NT can be played as minimum balanced, minimum and a misfit but not necessarily balanced, medium balanced, or probably other things. I suspect that the first problem was that the players didn't have an agreement about what 3NT meant.

Similarly, 3 can be played as natural, "something in clubs" (Phil), "clubs" without necessarily being descriptive (Han), or fourth-suit forcing. Not knowing which of these meanings was in use, it's hard to judge whether this hand should bid 3 or something else.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#22 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-September-29, 11:51

If you play 3C as natural (instead of 4SF or stop ask or whatnot), then I think it's clear to bid that. It cannot show less than a 55 and North can still have 5413/5431.
0

#23 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-September-29, 13:30

It seems there is some dispute over whether responder should rebid NT or clubs, and indeed what a club bid would show.

My question is: with the misfit in evidence, why should south not consider a simple preference of 2? Is Jx so terrible that south should shun it entirely? Or would 2 definitely promise 3 cards?
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#24 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2011-September-29, 14:00

View Postbillw55, on 2011-September-29, 13:30, said:

It seems there is some dispute over whether responder should rebid NT or clubs, and indeed what a club bid would show.

My question is: with the misfit in evidence, why should south not consider a simple preference of 2? Is Jx so terrible that south should shun it entirely? Or would 2 definitely promise 3 cards?


This question is strangely related.

I would guess that those who like to bid 2 with hands like these tend to favor notrump/strain probes and right-siding over slam probes when in doubt.

Those who instead bid 3 as artificial probably have the same bent toward notrump/strain probes and right-siding over slam probes, but with a purity to the major raise, probably.

Those who bid 3 naturally might be in the first category (also bidding 2 as possibly two) and thus favor notrump/strain probes and right-siding over slam probes when in doubt. However, they want side-suit purity.

Those who bid 3 as real, 2 as 3+, and 2NT as waiting (and possibly wrong-siding) probably stress slam auctions more than right-siding and strain probing.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users