BBO Discussion Forums: Developing Bidding Judgement - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 4 Pages +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Developing Bidding Judgement

#61 User is offline   Vampyr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,611
  • Joined: 2009-September-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2011-June-16, 09:56

View Postjogs, on 2011-June-16, 09:45, said:

Blackwood is both overused and misused. This happens all the time.


It is also properly used. This happens all the time too. It's a useful tool to have at one's disposal if used with care. Like an electric drill.

Quote


Don't remember Truscott.


This is a convention whereby 1z-(X)-2NT shows an invitational hand with support in z. It is one of the most useful conventions around and one which gives very little from doing away with the natural meaning of the bid.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
0

#62 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2011-June-16, 10:00

View PostVampyr, on 2011-June-16, 09:56, said:

This is a convention whereby 1z-(X)-2NT shows an invitational hand with support in z. It is one of the most useful conventions around and one which gives very little from doing away with the natural meaning of the bid.


this or a variant of it is called jordan 2n in acbl land, i think?
0

#63 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,666
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2011-June-16, 10:05

Some call it Jordan, some call it Truscott. I think there's another name for it as well (Dormer?)
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#64 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2011-June-16, 10:50

View PostVampyr, on 2011-June-16, 07:59, said:

does someone know how to find the other thread where this idea was discussed?

I remember that the thread was started by a self-professed novice who stated he, and his partner were interested in how to develope together. The thread broached play of the hands, vs defense, vs bidding system. Seems it was from 6-months to a year ago.

Would that help anyone find it? It didn't help me.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#65 User is offline   jogs 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,316
  • Joined: 2011-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:student of the game

Posted 2011-June-16, 11:17

View PostVampyr, on 2011-June-14, 10:36, said:



Playing online can be very helpful too, because you can take a record of every bid on every hand. This can be useful for self-study, as you can see exactly how different bidding decisions led to good/fair/poor contracts.


Also view the hand histories. See how everyone else bid and played the board.
0

#66 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2011-June-16, 11:38

OK Well I did a bunch of searches, and don't think I turned up the one Vampyr was looking for, but there were several good threads and a post by Fred on improving your bridge that I turned up as well:

This is JLOGIC on concentration/improving thought processes:
http://www.bridgebas...__1#entry522843

More stuff on improving your game, and some mention of natural bidding etc, here:
http://www.bridgebas...__1#entry407879

Study vs Playing:
http://www.bridgebas...__1#entry495750

Fred made a post in one of Kenrexford's threads about some wild auction in response to blackshoe's question, which is well written and seems to summarize a lot of the stuff in this thread:

View Postfred, on 2007-February-04, 11:14, said:

I am sorry, but the only good books I know of on this subject were written more than 50 years ago. Probably for some they would still be interesting to read, but the game has changed so much since then that I expect most non-experts reading such books (if they could even find a copy) would end up becoming confused.

I see most of today's books about bidding as analogous to those spam-like ads "work part time from your home and earn $100,000+ per year!" or "eat all the chocolate you want and never gain any weight!". Most modern books on bidding I have seen are nothing but hype and what they are hyping is some bidding system or collection of conventions that will "improve your results by 10% without you having to learn the basics!".

Here is what I would suggest:

Don't give a great deal of consious thought to this subject in your first few years of serious play. Learn a simple bidding system and only the few conventions that are so popular that they have essentially become part of "standard bidding" (unfortunately there are now quite a few conventions that fall into this category).

Keep your mind uncluttered with conventions that you don't really understand and play as many hands as possible, ideally with either a keen regular partner who is at roughly the same level as you or with a much better player who understands that it will help you more to spend your time discussing concepts like "a jump shift is forcing to game but a reverse is not" rather than the latest flavor of modified DONT.

Your brain is a remarkable machine. You will learn a lot of what is important by osmosis, especially if you manage to avoid distractions (like trying to come up with the best possible scheme of rescues when the 10-12 1NT opening that you shouldn't be using get doubled).

If you can afford to hire a professional player to be your partner or to give you online lessons (or whatever) you should do so, but do not hire anyone unless they are highly recommended by a person you trust and respect. If the pro or teacher starts by telling you that you must learn to play "4 of our minor is always 1430 Keycard Blackwood with specialized followups to the trump Queen ask" then find someone else - this person is trying to sell you snake oil.

After each session you play you should think about the hands and talk them over with your partner. If your partner is at the same level as you, try to make friends with an experienced player who is willing to discuss the hands you are not sure about (and who is the type of player whose idea of good advice does not involve teaching you that you would not have had a problem if you used his preferred variety of Extended 2-way Reverse Drury).

If you are fortunate enough to have access to an experienced player who is willing to help you, do not waste this opportunity by asking him questions that are designed to boost your ego (by trying to convince him/her to agree that your disaster on a particular hand was your partner's fault for example). LISTEN to your expert friend/teacher even if you disagree with him or her. Then THINK about it later. Do not get defensive when you are told that one of your bids was horrible. Instead try to understand what went wrong with your thinking process so that you can learn from your mistakes.

Once you get to the point that you consider yourself to be solid intermediate player (this should take 2 or 3 years of hard work) you should buy a subscription to The Bridge World magazine (and if you have friend who has a collection of back issues try to borrow them). Each month this magazine has a feature called The Master Solvers' Club. Read it and think about what you read. Re-read it and think about what you read.

You may find the other features of this magazine to be interesting as well, but it is fine if you read only The Master Solvers's Club in each issue.

This will help you to learn things like:

1) That bidding is not just an exercise in language, it is also an exercise in logic
2) How strong players apply logic to solve unfamiliar problems
3) The axioms that form the basis of this logic (which are "the basic principles of bidding theory" that I referred to in an earlier post)
4) You will also learn plenty about the language aspects of bidding, but most of these lessons will not involve learning the names and mechanics of new conventions.
5) That bidding situations in which the "right" answer is not at all clear are far from rare, regardless of how well you play.

This will also help you to improve your bidding judgment. Good bidding judgment is largely a function of experience. Reading what a bunch of good players have to say about a bunch of interesting bidding problems allows you to benefit from their vast experience without having to experience the same hands yourself.

Keep in mind that in many ways "learning the basics of bidding theory" is similar to things like "learning the basics of probability theory" or "learning the mechanics of compound squeezes" - these are all just parts of the game. On any given hand any given part of the game is unlikely to matter. You can survive (and you can certainly enjoy bridge) without learning such things.

All players are better at some parts of the game than others. For most parts of the game it is not necessary to be highly proficient in order to achieve reasonable results at the table.

Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com

Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
3

#67 User is offline   Vampyr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,611
  • Joined: 2009-September-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2011-June-16, 12:13

View Postmtvesuvius, on 2011-June-16, 11:38, said:

OK Well I did a bunch of searches, and don't think I turned up the one Vampyr was looking for,


No, those were good but not the one I am looking for. The one I was thinking of may have been started by an OP stating that more conventions and more complicated systems means better bridge.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
0

#68 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2011-June-16, 12:23

View PostVampyr, on 2011-June-16, 12:13, said:

No, those were good but not the one I am looking for. The one I was thinking of may have been started by an OP stating that more conventions and more complicated systems means better bridge.

This one?
http://www.bridgebas...__1#entry530696

I'm out of ideas lol
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#69 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-June-16, 15:41

This thread discusses Hamman and system vs skill, but I don't think I've read the whole thing and I don't know if it's relevant to this discussion.
OK
bed
0

#70 User is offline   jogs 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,316
  • Joined: 2011-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:student of the game

Posted 2011-June-16, 20:51

View PostP_Marlowe, on 2011-June-14, 02:06, said:

Hi,

Just to have a nonbridge related example - Poker.

I dont play Poker, but once in a while I am watching Poker on TV.
And a comment heard very often is, that the wave of new players, that have reached
the to of the game in such a short period is due to the fact, that online makes it
easier to play / see lots of hands in a very short time.

But - you also need to analyze, what you are doing, and you have to do it on a
regular basis.

With kind regards
Marlowe


Many of the younger players are able to play poker multiple screens simultaneously. 4 screens means they can play about 200 hands per hour. Can't imagine anyone playing two screens of bridge. And it's really hard to play faster than 12 boards an hour. It's possible to become a strong poker player after about 12-18 months. Takes years to become a halfway decent bridge player.
0

  • 4 Pages +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

24 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 24 guests, 0 anonymous users