IMPs, E/W are silent otherwise
Who's Crazy? Is it you?
#1
Posted 2011-June-01, 12:08
IMPs, E/W are silent otherwise
East4Evil ♥ sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
#2
Posted 2011-June-01, 13:49
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#3
Posted 2011-June-01, 14:39
Over a double, South's action is clear cut - 4♠. I don't know why anyone would bid anything else.
Over a pass, South MIGHT balance, but that action is hardly clear.
#4
Posted 2011-June-01, 15:19
I think balancing with the South hand is taking quite a position. I wouldn't even think of it at this vulnerability. And even at favorable it's a stretch, since the opponents haven't bid a game.
#5
Posted 2011-June-01, 19:49
On the other hand i would defienetely not balance with South hand if N passes, no way. This kinda weak balance, over a 4 level preempt, gives WAY too wide range for the guy who bid at 4th seat and i dont think it can be handled effectively in the long run.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#7
Posted 2011-June-02, 04:19
The point is if pard is going to bid a 4 card major suit over my dbl, this is certainly going to be an uphill battle on the obvious club force. Even with a 5-3 fit it's not certain 4M makes (here it definitely isn't going to be a piece of cake if trumps are 4-1).
#8
Posted 2011-June-02, 05:34
If North decides to Pass South cannot bid unless his/her partner took a long time before passing. And that was sarcastic.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#9
Posted 2011-June-02, 08:08
whereagles, on 2011-June-02, 04:19, said:
The point is if pard is going to bid a 4 card major suit over my dbl, this is certainly going to be an uphill battle on the obvious club force. Even with a 5-3 fit it's not certain 4M makes (here it definitely isn't going to be a piece of cake if trumps are 4-1).
The good news is, only 13 ♣ in the deck and the guy with long trumps won't be the ones with long trumps.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#10
Posted 2011-June-02, 09:01
CSGibson, on 2011-June-02, 01:30, said:
He's just " sanely-challenged " ...
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#11
Posted 2011-June-02, 09:05
CSGibson, on 2011-June-02, 01:30, said:
+1
I can't wait to see his response to Fred's comment that Qxxx Kx AKQx xxx shouldn't bid 2♣ over 1♥ on Hand 3.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#12
Posted 2011-June-02, 14:00
#13
Posted 2011-June-02, 17:05
*Waits for someone to look up myhands to see if I did it or not*
East4Evil ♥ sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
#14
Posted 2011-June-02, 17:23
If for some reason North passes then South should pass hesitation or not.
#15
Posted 2011-June-03, 00:20
with a x-------- after you bid 4 sp-now another problem arises.
the 4cl bids 5 clubs-----------
For north to pass 4cl is unheard off also opp has not opened 3n/t
so unlikly to have ace hts-and his clubs could be AQJ+
and hold K diamonds--so south could back in again with 5 diamonds.
that will sort it out
#16
Posted 2011-June-03, 00:56
#17
Posted 2011-June-09, 00:29
Free, on 2011-June-03, 00:56, said:
♥
100% in line with you.
#18
Posted 2011-June-09, 03:27
I think at the table I would have passed with the North hand, but the argument,
that we know, where 10 clubs are, and that p holds on avergage at most 2, makes
double very attractive - since he wont have the power to get in.
We know, that our side owns the deck, p does not know this.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)