BBO Discussion Forums: Adjustment question - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Adjustment question TD was called when the bord was finished

#21 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2004-August-16, 13:09

[quote name='hrothgar' date='Aug 16 2004, 01:40 PM'] [quote name='jtfanclub' date='Aug 16 2004, 09:14 PM'] [url="http://www.acbl.org/play/alertChart.html"]http://www.acbl.org/play/alertChart.html[/url]

makes no distinction between 2[cl]-2[di]-2N-3[cl] and 2N-3[cl]. [/QUOTE]
Actually, yes it does. From the link:

[QUOTE]Responses to Notrump Opening Bids and Overcalls[/QUOTE] [/QUOTE]
Please consult the following link: [url="http://www.acbl.org/play/alertprocedures.html"]http://www.acbl.org/play/alertprocedures.html[/url]

More specifically, look at the following quote:

NOTE: A 2NT rebid after a response to a strong 2♣ opening is deemed to be a strong notrump opening for the purposes of this regulation, as is a 1NT or 2NT rebid after a strong, artificial 1[cl] opening and response.

I don't think that it gets much clearer than this... [/quote]
I did not see that...thank you. I stand corrected.

That didn't used to be there, did it?
0

#22 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,725
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2004-August-16, 13:12

[quote name='jtfanclub' date='Aug 16 2004, 10:09 PM'] [quote name='hrothgar' date='Aug 16 2004, 01:40 PM'] [quote name='jtfanclub' date='Aug 16 2004, 09:14 PM'] [url="http://www.acbl.org/play/alertChart.html"]http://www.acbl.org/play/alertChart.html[/url]

makes no distinction between 2[cl]-2[di]-2N-3[cl] and 2N-3[cl]. [/QUOTE]
Actually, yes it does. From the link:

[QUOTE]Responses to Notrump Opening Bids and Overcalls[/QUOTE] [/QUOTE]
Please consult the following link: [url="http://www.acbl.org/play/alertprocedures.html"]http://www.acbl.org/play/alertprocedures.html[/url]

More specifically, look at the following quote:

NOTE: A 2NT rebid after a response to a strong 2♣ opening is deemed to be a strong notrump opening for the purposes of this regulation, as is a 1NT or 2NT rebid after a strong, artificial 1[cl] opening and response.

I don't think that it gets much clearer than this... [/QUOTE]
I did not see that...thank you. I stand corrected.

That didn't used to be there, did it? [/quote]
Not sure when it got added
sorry
Alderaan delenda est
0

#23 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2004-August-16, 14:29

jtfanclub, on Aug 16 2004, 01:14 PM, said:

Note that it doesn't say Notrump Opening Bids, Overcalls, and rebids (or just Notrump Bids)...I have to assume that's a deliberate omission. That would mean that Stayman does have to be alerted after no-trump rebids.

From the second row of the alert chart, in the "category" column is: Conventional/Artificial. In the same row, in the "No Alert" column is: Stayman (next higher level of clubs). You don't really have to look any further.
0

#24 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2004-August-16, 14:31

jtfanclub, on Aug 16 2004, 01:14 PM, said:

I have to assume that's a deliberate omission.

You're talking about the ACBL. Omissions are seldom deliberate. ;)
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users