Never put an eight-card suit down in dummy (English) Premier League I
#2
Posted 2010-September-12, 17:08
#3
Posted 2010-September-12, 20:16
#4
Posted 2010-September-12, 20:43
#5
Posted 2010-September-13, 00:57
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#6
Posted 2010-September-13, 02:00
jdonn, on Sep 13 2010, 02:43 AM, said:
You have nine, yes
#7
Posted 2010-September-13, 03:17
#9
Posted 2010-September-13, 04:05
A 2♠ psyche comes to mind, but pard, who is bound to have like 3-4 of those, might take that a bit too seriously, so I'll just be terrible and all those bad adjectives and bid 5♣.
#10
Posted 2010-September-13, 04:51
JLOGIC, on Sep 12 2010, 11:08 PM, said:
You may well think it is terrible to bid at any vul, but I still feel I should clarify for you that we are at favourable
#11
Posted 2010-September-13, 05:47
3♣ suits me fine trying to keep opponents out.
I will bid 3♣ and will insist on ♣ if necessary, at least up to the 5 level and I will not let the opponents play below the 5 level.
I doubt that ♣ bids will excite partner. If it does, opponents will have a very good fit in a major.
My guess is that on average even 5♣ will produce less undertricks than 2♦
Rainer Herrmann
#12
Posted 2010-September-13, 12:41
MickyB, on Sep 13 2010, 05:51 AM, said:
JLOGIC, on Sep 12 2010, 11:08 PM, said:
You may well think it is terrible to bid at any vul, but I still feel I should clarify for you that we are at favourable
haha, this time I knew!
#13
Posted 2010-September-13, 12:57
In the absence of any agreements about fit bids in the way, 5C now looks sensible - more descriptive than 3C begging partner to repeat his diamonds again, anyway.
#14
Posted 2010-September-13, 12:59
#15
Posted 2010-September-13, 15:30
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#16
Posted 2010-September-13, 15:33
Pict, on Sep 13 2010, 06:59 PM, said:
Cos even if its the right contract, you will most likelly play 6 then.
#17
Posted 2010-September-14, 00:36
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#18
Posted 2010-September-14, 10:41
#19
Posted 2010-September-14, 18:36
The passers will go down two in 2♦. The 3♣ bidders will go down one or two in 4♣, but they won't be doubled. The opponents can make a part score.
None of this is really all that surprising after the auction begins as it has begun. I had some sympathy with our team-mates, because at their table West began with a strong club, North showed spades and diamonds and any strength, and East showed some values, so South hadn't much idea what the right approach was. Minus 500 did not compare well with minus 110 at our table when 3♣ (which was not forcing) was passed out and allowed to make, but it wouldn't have compared very well with plus 50 either.
In the natural auction given, however, if 3♣ is forcing then pass is indeed a "no-brainer". I reserve judgement as to the quantity of brains required to play 3♣ as showing a diamond fit, but I express no such reservations regarding a jump to 5♣. As Jeremy Flint so aptly put it, why squeal before you are hurt?
And sealed the Law by vote,
It little matters what they thought -
We hang for what they wrote.
#20
Posted 2010-September-14, 22:05

Help

1H-2D-P-??
3C now is forcing.