BBO Discussion Forums: I Jump To Game Over Passed Hand's 1N! - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

I Jump To Game Over Passed Hand's 1N! Should I have bid it this way?

#1 User is offline   gurgistan 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 203
  • Joined: 2010-January-06

Posted 2010-August-07, 03:09

Scoring: IMP

This is an uncontested auction.
I am 3rd seat opener with 1. Partner bids 1N. This is, of course, non-forcing as a passed hand. I jump to 4. I figure he has a little something and my length and shortages might just make 4 doable. I did think of rebidding 3 and letting Partner decide if we should be in game but then I recalled he was a passed hand and that 3 would just get passed over. So I bid game. A few tables found game but one just bid 4 outright from 3rd seat over a passed partner. That has to be wrong! He (like I) only has 7 hearts.

Please comment upon the wisdom of the bidding and my thought process.

0

#2 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2010-August-07, 03:25

You have a 6 loser hand. Imo you do not have a 4 heart bid and should bid only 3H.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#3 User is offline   cloa513 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,529
  • Joined: 2008-December-02

Posted 2010-August-07, 03:33

Your flaw is defining major preempts in 3rd and fourth seat- they should be good opening hands with shortage in the other major. Indeed many people bid 4H/4S with opening hands long major suit 7 or 8 in all seats but not significant slam potential -two aces not more. With your example, you can bid 3H and partner should raise to 4H.
0

#4 User is offline   bluecalm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,555
  • Joined: 2007-January-22

Posted 2010-August-07, 03:54

Quote

Your flaw is defining major preempts in 3rd and fourth seat- they should be good opening hands with shortage in the other major.


:D :unsure: :unsure:


Anyway hand is marginal 3. 4 is huge overbid.
Unfortunately there isn't simple way to evaluate those. I have some methods which I trust and I did tons of simuls for similar situations. WC players probably have feel for correct bid without all the work...
0

#5 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2010-August-07, 04:10

cloa513, on Aug 7 2010, 04:33 PM, said:

Your flaw is defining major preempts in 3rd and fourth seat- they should be good opening hands with shortage in the other major.

4th seat, yes, though I still query the comment regarding shortness, 3rd seat definitely not. At favourable vul for example, a 3rd seat pre empt is often rubbish.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#6 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2010-August-07, 05:05

3 is plenty with the East hand. Partner can easily have enough to bid one more despite being a passed hand.

Anyway it's not a good game. You need diamonds 3-3 or they get a ruff and you also need the club finesse so it's about 18% on best defence. Even against average defence I'd expect to make less than half the time. The main reason to bid 4 is that they will usually make at least 3 when you go down. But they weren't balancing over 3 so that rationale is no longer valid at the point you bid 4 instead of 3.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users