Here's one unremarkable but bothersome hand,
Whooop
#1
Posted 2009-August-27, 11:43
Here's one unremarkable but bothersome hand,
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
#2
Posted 2009-August-27, 11:56
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2009-August-27, 11:58
Congrats on placing. I'm not sure there is any "right" answer on this hand. If I had to assign points (Challenge the Champs or some such), I'd expect to see
X = 8
P = 6
1N = 3
2♥ = 2
#4
Posted 2009-August-27, 12:10
#5
Posted 2009-August-27, 12:32
jillybean, on Aug 27 2009, 12:43 PM, said:
Here's one unremarkable but bothersome hand,
1♥ (1♠) ?
an uncomfortable 1NT or pass look to be the choices and since I get to bid b4 my LHO I get to beat them to bidding 1NT
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#6
Posted 2009-August-27, 12:49
"gwnn" said:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
#7
Posted 2009-August-27, 12:52
If pard passes out 1♠, you should feel pretty good.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#8
Posted 2009-August-27, 17:46
It is MP all white. If we bid 1NT and take 7 tricks we get 90. If the opps end up in 1NT and we take 7 tricks we get 50 and visa versa.
If PD passes out 1♠ and we beat it one, that is 50, if we beat it 2 it is only 100 but that won't outscore what we may make should 2NT or 2♥ or 3m make.
I don't care for X here as we don't have 4 cards in each minor and on a bad day end up in a 33 fit. After our 1NT pd may rebid a 4 card minor anyhow and we end up in the same place as after X.
#9
Posted 2009-August-27, 17:57
#10
Posted 2009-August-27, 17:57
1♥ (1♠) AP
Misdefended to let them make 1♠
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
#11
Posted 2009-August-27, 18:04
#12
Posted 2009-August-27, 18:28
#13
Posted 2009-August-28, 10:04
I agree that partner should be doubling.
"gwnn" said:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
#14
Posted 2009-August-28, 10:43
inquiry, on Aug 28 2009, 02:04 AM, said:
No it's not.
George Carlin
#15
Posted 2009-August-28, 11:41
gwnn, on Aug 28 2009, 11:43 AM, said:
inquiry, on Aug 28 2009, 02:04 AM, said:
No it's not.
I agree. But it is a legal call.
#16
Posted 2009-August-28, 13:16
Of course, partner might opt to pass with 2533 and then blame you for not doubling for him.
BTW -- after 1♥-X-?, I would consider bidding 2♥ with this hand, notwithstanding the doubleton heart, simply because of the lead advantage. That may be sick, and I probably would not do it in reality, but I point this out because it brings up a point, namely that an aggressive bid here is not that beneficial to partner on lead, as you may well be on lead if you defend. Instead, a call by you might actually help Declarer more, if the opponents buy the contract.
-P.J. Painter.
#17
Posted 2009-August-29, 03:59
Bill
#18
Posted 2009-August-29, 09:26
bill1157, on Aug 29 2009, 02:59 AM, said:
Bill
Seriously?
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
#19
Posted 2009-August-29, 11:28
#20
Posted 2009-August-29, 12:01
Winstonm, on Aug 29 2009, 12:28 PM, said:
Hmm PD opened..we'd respond 1NT with 6 HCP. Why do we need to be stronger here?

Help

1♥ (1♠) ?