BBO Discussion Forums: Bidding problem? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Bidding problem? playing 2/1

#1 User is offline   vuroth 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,459
  • Joined: 2007-June-03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-May-19, 09:10

1 P ?

Scoring: MP


How about

Scoring: MP


Part 2 is that
Spoiler


V
Still decidedly intermediate - don't take my guesses as authoritative.

"gwnn" said:

rule number 1 in efficient forum reading:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
0

#2 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2009-May-19, 09:40

1. 1H.

2. 2C.

With a gameforcing hand, bid your longest suit first. Hand 1 isn't strong enough to bid 2C first and then look for a major suit fit so make sure you bid a major.

Note that you should start with 1H on the first no matter what system you play.

A case can be made to bid 1H on the second one as well. With this shape you might miss a major suit fit even when you start with 2C (for example when partner rebids 2NT). I gave the above answer because generally you should bid your longest suit first with a game-forcing hand.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#3 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-May-19, 09:41

1 for both for me...

Along the same lines, just this morning I held:

Q9xx
AJxx
-------
KQJTx

1 - (P) - 1 - (P)
2 - (P) - 2* - (X)
3** - (P) - ?

*Raise Ask
**3 Card Support; Maximum

What's your choice now?
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#4 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2009-May-19, 10:17

I would bid 3NT with your hand Adam, and hope partner has weak clubs.

You might play something like this over 2S:

2NT = 3-card support, minimum.
3C = 3-card support, max, weakness in lower ranking suit.
3D = 3-card support, max, weakness in higher ranking suit.
3H = 4-card support, minimum, no shortness.
higher = 4-card support, extras, no shortness, and then shortness: lower, higher.

Over 2NT responder can ask for weakness by bidding the cheapest step skipping opener's minor (so you bid 3C here but 3D if opener had opened 1C). Then again: low, high. 3D over 2NT would be to play.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#5 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-May-19, 10:47

I came up with this at some point, and it seems both simple and useful.

1 1
2 2NT

3/3/3: 3 card raise, "natural" bids, could be min or max. Bidding 3 is 3-6 or 3(23)5, 3 is 3244 or 3145, 3 is 3424 or 3415. If partner signs off in 3 then you bid 3NT with a max. Technically these bids (at least in the minors) are NF even though partner could have a max, but passing would be rare. But sometimes you only want to be in game opposite a max with 4. Also the cheapest new suit bid can be a further ask for min/max and balanced or short in the last suit.
3: Min with 4.
3NT: Balanced max with 4, offering 3NT.
4+: Normal (splinters in new suits, etc.)

When hearts are bid and raised then there could be some switches in the answers between spades and notrump, but otherwise the same.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#6 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2009-May-19, 10:49

I would respond 1 with either hand.
0

#7 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2009-May-19, 11:49

rogerclee, on May 19 2009, 05:49 PM, said:

I would respond 1 with either hand.

Me too, not quite strong enough to GF with the second hand.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#8 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-May-19, 12:29

1 is about as obvious as it gets, unless you have a special convention for these hands.

What to do next is a matter of bidding style and how often partner raises with three-card support. Personally, and this may be funny to some, I would be assured of 4-card support of partner raised hearts, as in my partnerships we only raise with three-card support when holding a hand pattern necessitating a reverse to describe but with insufficient values to reverse, and that cannot happen after 1-P-1. The funny part, though, is that a slight problem actually arises if Opener bids 1, because we might very well bid 3-card spade suits with a COV in spades and 3253 shape.

FWIW, using this "too weak to reverse" approach, you sort of do something similar to Josh's approach. 2NT asks, and Opener rebids his minor with 3-card support only. In many situations, this shows a specific, known 5431 shape. If the outside suits could be 4-1 or 1-4, meaning after a 1 opening and a 1 response, that also can be unwound: (1-1-2-2NT-3!-3?-3 = 3415, but 3 = 3145).
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#9 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,094
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2009-May-19, 12:41

hanp, on May 19 2009, 10:40 AM, said:

1. 1H.

2. 2C.

With a gameforcing hand, bid your longest suit first. Hand 1 isn't strong enough to bid 2C first and then look for a major suit fit so make sure you bid a major.

Note that you should start with 1H on the first no matter what system you play.

A case can be made to bid 1H on the second one as well. With this shape you might miss a major suit fit even when you start with 2C (for example when partner rebids 2NT). I gave the above answer because generally you should bid your longest suit first with a game-forcing hand.

Agree with this. I think the potential of a fit is too great and I don't want to play 'catch-up' with 1 on the 2nd.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users