BBO Discussion Forums: your call? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

your call?

Poll: response to weak 2 (19 member(s) have cast votes)

response to weak 2

  1. Pass (11 votes [57.89%])

    Percentage of vote: 57.89%

  2. 2NT (Ogust responses) (1 votes [5.26%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.26%

  3. 3D (forcing one round) (5 votes [26.32%])

    Percentage of vote: 26.32%

  4. Other (please describe) (2 votes [10.53%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.53%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   oldman5757 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 85
  • Joined: 2007-November-18

Posted 2009-April-14, 08:06

This is my first poll, so I hope I haven't messed it up.

From a club game, both V at MPs, opps are silent. P bids 2 and you hold:


K94
AKQ872
QJ64

Using the methods shown, what is the best action? Would other methods work better? :)
0

#2 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,045
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-April-14, 08:26

Pass.

It partly depends on the soundness of your weak to openings
in first or second position at the given vul, but not much.

Playing IMPs your aim should be to go plus, if your partner
opened a rotten weak, 3D may play better than 2S, but it
is not clear if 4D playes better than 2S.

And with the given methods, you cant stop in 3D.

If you would play transfer responses, say 2NT being the relais,
with 3C being transfer, partner being able to break the transfer
with a max. and supp, this would work of course better.
But I dont know, if someone plays such a system after a weak two,
I seem to recall someone describing such a method, but I may be
wrong.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#3 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2009-April-14, 09:08

Pass. If I could bid a NF 3, I would.
0

#4 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,094
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2009-April-14, 09:14

Apollo81, on Apr 14 2009, 10:08 AM, said:

Pass. If I could bid a NF 3, I would.

Agree.

Deal out some maximums and most will be poor dummies for 3N. Even is pard puts down the AK, there is still the matter of getting to the board.

Tweak the hand a little: x, Axx, AKQxxx, QJx and I then would make a move.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#5 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2009-April-14, 09:43

Pass + double whatever they bid, if you're lucky enough they do :P
0

#6 User is offline   se12sam 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 184
  • Joined: 2009-March-22

Posted 2009-April-14, 09:52

I'd go for Ogust (2NT).

1. In the unlikely event of partner bidding 3NT (AKQxxx in spade, nothing outside), I bid 4S. This should have decent play

2. If he bids "good hand, good suit" (3S), I'd pass (OR try for a thin game with a 4S bid)

3. If partner has a good hand, poor suit (3H), 3NT should have some play even with negligible contribution from the spade suit itself.

4. I'd pass 3D from partner ("poor hand, good suit")

5. Finally, I'd correct 3C to 3D

The only problem is with the last sequence. If partner bids 3C, will he take my 3D as forcing? If yes, I'm stuck --- but when I used to play Ogust, I used to treat 3D/3H rebids by responder as "my suit, to play". With a scratch partner, this is the only part that would worry me and make me wonder whether I should pass
0

#7 User is offline   spotlight7 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 342
  • Joined: 2009-March-21

Posted 2009-April-14, 11:53

Hi:

I play transfer replies to weak two bids and partner is allowed :) to break the transfer.

so 2S-3C* here

Regards,
Robert
0

#8 User is offline   JLOL 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,033
  • Joined: 2008-December-05

Posted 2009-April-14, 13:33

Pass
0

#9 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-April-14, 17:03

Pass. We'll get out of this, or we will play 2 which is also fine.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#10 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-April-14, 17:07

Partner's spades are worthless to me in 3, but my cards cannot be all bad for partner in 2.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users