Page 1 of 1
8-5, your plan? Another Gitelman Hand Labs LLC product!
#1
Posted 2009-April-09, 22:23
XIMPs, 1rst seat, favorable
--, KQT87432, --, AK754
I opened 1♥. Agree?
It went
1♥-2♠-P-P; ?
What now?
--, KQT87432, --, AK754
I opened 1♥. Agree?
It went
1♥-2♠-P-P; ?
What now?
"It is not enough to be a good player. You must also play well." -- Tarrasch
#2
Posted 2009-April-09, 23:15
8-5 is still 1-suited I think. I might try 6♥ and since partner would yell at me for opening 2♣ on a 2 loser hand.
Over 2♠, 3♣ sounds forcing, and I'll follow up with 5N over partner's likely 3N.
Over 2♠, 3♣ sounds forcing, and I'll follow up with 5N over partner's likely 3N.
#3
Posted 2009-April-09, 23:31
Rob F, on Apr 10 2009, 12:15 AM, said:
Over 2♠, 3♣ sounds forcing,
Not to me, you would get to play 3♣ most of the time opposite me.
Trying to learn, I have many questions.
#4
Posted 2009-April-10, 01:54
Rob, why would 3C be forcing?
As a general rule when one hand has shown nothing you can't make forcing bids unless they are cuebids or some jumps.
As a general rule when one hand has shown nothing you can't make forcing bids unless they are cuebids or some jumps.
New website: http://www.justinlall.com
#5
Posted 2009-April-10, 03:42
Agree with 1H.
3!S now.
Over 3NT I bid 4C, this must be forcing.
Over 4C I think I'll just bid 6C, I doubt any RKC or cuebidding can tell me if partner holds specifically H ace.
Over 4D I take the negative route of 4H.
3!S now.
Over 3NT I bid 4C, this must be forcing.
Over 4C I think I'll just bid 6C, I doubt any RKC or cuebidding can tell me if partner holds specifically H ace.
Over 4D I take the negative route of 4H.
#6
Posted 2009-April-10, 07:36
I like 1♥ also, but 2♣ may be better if you have good methods over 2♣. 3♠ first... I am planning on bidding 6♥ eventually, but it cannot hurt to see if I can find out more, so I will probably bid 4♠ next. I will bid 4♣ over 3NT and 6♣ over 4♣ though... Actually, this is a hand where in my system, I would open 4NT as a specific ace ask. Now if partner doesn't bid 5♥ showing the A♥, I will bid 6♥. Unfortunately this loses the club fit potentially, and we may get too high, but I think if we're willing to force to slam after partner has shown nothing, then 4NT is acceptable.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#7
Posted 2009-April-10, 09:02
JLOL, on Apr 10 2009, 02:54 AM, said:
Rob, why would 3C be forcing?
As a general rule when one hand has shown nothing you can't make forcing bids unless they are cuebids or some jumps.
As a general rule when one hand has shown nothing you can't make forcing bids unless they are cuebids or some jumps.
Gag, not this one again.
Obviously 3♣ is NF.
I'm also sure many would take 4♣ as NF too !?
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#8
Posted 2009-April-10, 09:48
Rob F, on Apr 10 2009, 12:15 AM, said:
<snip>
Over 2♠, 3♣ sounds forcing
<snip>
Over 2♠, 3♣ sounds forcing
<snip>
LOL
Auto-Posted with lol.iphoneapps.com
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#10
Posted 2009-April-13, 12:01
I'd expect a 6-6 for a 6♣ rebid
I would go for sure with 3♠ now, lets give partner a chance to bid clubs himself.
I'd like to bid 1♥+3♠+4♣+5♥ as the better explanation possible.
I would go for sure with 3♠ now, lets give partner a chance to bid clubs himself.
I'd like to bid 1♥+3♠+4♣+5♥ as the better explanation possible.
Page 1 of 1

Help
