In a system of your choice, can you construct a reasonable sequence to 6H?
Can you bid this slam?
#1
Posted 2009-April-10, 01:13
In a system of your choice, can you construct a reasonable sequence to 6H?
#2
Posted 2009-April-10, 01:33
1H-2C (std opening; nat or bal, GF)
2H-2S (extra values no extreme shape; ask)
2N-3C (4 spades; ask)
3D-3H (5431 or 5440; ask)
3S-? (5431)
Now North has an interesting problem, but I don't think he is worth a slam force; he would probably invite a heart slam with 4C-4D-4H. South has good trumps but not many controls and a minimum in context, so he would pass. He would not fully appreciate the values of his two jacks.
[I don't think this is interesting to anyone but a good excuse for my to test my system-knowledge.]
#3
Posted 2009-April-10, 01:52
#4
Posted 2009-April-10, 04:30
However in strong club/pass this can be found, but even then it's more about luck and how the specific methods happen to work. Some results merchanting is definetly assumed here
Here is the most succesful auction I could think of.
Pass! - 1C! (Art 14+, 4+ctrls, Art GF, 3+ ctrls)
1H! - 1S (Relay reversal, 4+H or S single suiter)
1NT! - 2C (4+S, two-suiter or H single suiter)
2D! - 2H (5+H, 4+S)
3D! - 3H (Specifically 4531)
3S! - 4C (4 controls)
4D! - 4H (AK in H)
4NT! - 5C (King of diamonds)
5S! - 6H (Both major queens found, let's roll to the six)
This auction requires a lot of little things to make it possible. First and the most important thing is that responder does the asking, because he can basicly due the reversal be sure of good trumps quality holding JT. Also very luckily the answers on relays can't take you too high here.
#5
Posted 2009-April-10, 06:11
1♥-2♣
2♠-2NT
3♦-3♥
4♥-4♠
4NT-5♥
6♥
2♠ was natural and showed extras
2NT was descriptive. That is, it denied three-card heart support and showed a diamond stop.
3♦ is one of the few fourth-suit bids that I'd play as natural
Responder's decision to move over 4♥ looks a bit pushy, but he knows the hands fit well. Opener's failure to bid 3NT over 3♥ suggests good hearts and no club honour.
After 4♠, opener can appreciate the value of ♠J, because it's opposite the ace or king. He also knows his diamond holding is pulling its weight, because it's opposite a stopper.
If I had this auction in real life, I'd be quite pleased.
This post has been edited by gnasher: 2009-April-10, 06:11
#6
Posted 2009-April-10, 07:40
gnasher, on Apr 10 2009, 07:11 AM, said:
1♥-2♣
2♠-2NT
3♦-3♥
4♥-4♠
4NT-5♥
6♥
I was about to suggest the same auction. The only pushy/questionable call seems to be 4♠, but when opener has been able to complete his shape (with 3♦) and then fails to bid 3N over 3♥, it seems reasonable to me. Also like gnasher, I'd be pretty pleased to find this at the table.
Edit: I should also add that I'm more comfortable with opener's reverse in a limited opening bid system. In standard, reversing after responder has bid your singleton might be pushy, but that depends a bit on your post-2/1 reverse style/agreements.
#7
Posted 2009-April-10, 08:47
The auction would develop on the same lines:
1♥ - 2♦
2♠ - 2NT
3♦ - 3♥
where 3♦ completes opener's pattern and 3♥ shows some support.
Responder now knows that the Club Ace is facing shortness and the Diamond suit is facing probable 3-card length. Opener now knows that the KJx in Diamonds is a useful holding facing a decent Diamond suit - something opener would not know if responder had initialy bid 2♣.
But who makes a slam try and how ?
If opener launches RKCB, before or after some cue bids, the 5♥ response could be the actual hand or:
♠)Axx ♥)JT ♦)AQxx ♣)Kxxx
where slam is not so hot.
If responder launches RKCB opener's reply could be the actual hand or:
♠AJxx ♥AQxxx ♦)KJx ♣x
where again slam is not good.
A straight cue bidding approach won't help either facing the alternate hand for responder.
If you get there, good for you mate.
#8
Posted 2009-April-10, 09:35
RichMor, on Apr 10 2009, 03:47 PM, said:
If opener launches RKCB, before or after some cue bids, the 5♥ response could be the actual hand or:
♠)Axx ♥)JT ♦)AQxx ♣)Kxxx
where slam is not so hot.
Responder clearly shouldn't make a slam try on this, knowing that he's opposite a 4531 shape.
Quote
♠AJxx ♥AQxxx ♦)KJx ♣x
where again slam is not good.
Slam is OK opposite that. However, that sort of consideration is the reason that responder's slam try, if he makes one, should be 4♠, which says something useful about his hand.
You seem to be conflating the terms "make a slam try" and "launch RKCB". They are different things: a slam try says "I'm interested in slam. What do you think?" RKCB says "I want to know how many aces you have."
#9
Posted 2009-April-10, 09:44
1♣ (Strong)
1NT - 2♣ (12-14 Bal. or 15+ Any; Relay Asking)
2♦ - 2♥ (12-14 Bal.; Relay)
3♠ - 4♣ (32=4=4; Relay)
4♦ - 4♥ (3=2=4=4; Relay)
5♦ - 5♥ (5 Controls; Relay)
6♣ - 6♥ (K♠ or All other Kings; Signoff)
Pass - *Cringe*
This requires insanely agressive bidding from South... I think I would only be in 3NT however.
#10
Posted 2009-April-10, 09:58
1♣ - 1♠ - (16+, 8+ balanced or red suits)
2NT - 3♣ - (3 suited short clubs narrowed to a few particular shapes and can't have stiff honor, asking)
3♦ - 3♥ - (4531, asking)
3♠ - 4♣ - (5 or fewer controls, asking)
4♦ - 4♥ - (AK or neither in hearts, asking)
4♠ - 6♥ (AK or neither in spades, responder essentially knows opener's exact hand including jacks to make up 16 hcp)
#11
Posted 2009-April-10, 11:49
1♣ (16+) - 1♥ (4+♠ or balanced, G.F.)
1♠ (Relay) - 1NT (Balanced 8-13)
2♣ (Transfer Stayman) - 3♥ (Max and 3=2=4=4)
3NT (minimum) - 4♥ (5 controls + Q to make 12-13 hcp) Edited
(9 controls, slam possible with good fit and singleton if no wastage in clubs)
(a) 5♣ (CAB) - 5♠ (Ace, but not the K)
6♥ (Eureka! Assuming no ♥ loser and behind in the match) p p p
OR (b) pass 4♥ (assuming ahead in the match)
Whoops, revision needed!? Tough Hand!!!
C3: Copious Canape Club is still my favorite system. (Ultra upgraded, PM for notes)
Santa Fe Precision ♣ published 8/19. TOP3 published 11/20. Magic experiment (Science Modernized) with Lenzo. 2020: Jan Eric Larsson's Cottontail ♣. 2020. BFUN (Bridge For the UNbalanced) 2021: Weiss Simplified ♣ (Canape & Relay). 2022: Canary ♣ Modernized, 2023-4: KOK Canape, 2025-6: Canape!
#12
Posted 2009-April-10, 11:52
-P.J. Painter.
#13
Posted 2009-April-10, 14:31
#14
Posted 2009-April-10, 15:05
Flameous, on Apr 10 2009, 03:31 PM, said:
The reason is that he was listing his auction with explanations, but it reached the maximum number of lines allowed in one post.
#15
Posted 2009-April-10, 16:06
#16
Posted 2009-April-10, 19:16
1NT - 2♥ (r;same rank 4432)
2♠ - 3♥ (r;3244)
3nt - 4♥ (to play; my hand was really good with 5 controls)
4♠ - 5♥ (where?; one of top 2 in every suit but hearts)
6♥ (may as well try it)
This might be the way I'd get here. I think South tries to sign off and North pushes them higher and South hopes it wasn't ♣K and ♠A and hopes there's luck in diamonds too (Q on side or with partner).
#17
Posted 2009-April-11, 03:24
Mbodell, on Apr 11 2009, 02:16 AM, said:
1NT - 2♥ (r;same rank 4432)
2♠ - 3♥ (r;3244)
3nt - 4♥ (to play; my hand was really good with 5 controls)
4♠ - 5♥ (where?; one of top 2 in every suit but hearts)
6♥ (may as well try it)
This might be the way I'd get here. I think South tries to sign off and North pushes them higher and South hopes it wasn't ♣K and ♠A and hopes there's luck in diamonds too (Q on side or with partner).
And hopes that partner has ♥J.
#19
Posted 2009-April-13, 12:15
What now? North should be very interested in slam, lets count: assuming a blank singleton club and 16 HCP on partner's hand, we have 26 HCP combined on the rest, if all we miss is an Ace we should have 12 easy tricks.
Worst of all is to have 2 queens missing, or ♦K+♠J. Others seem to provide 12 tricks.
Really driving to slam doesn't look wrong.

Help
