BBO Discussion Forums: Can you bid this slam? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Can you bid this slam?

#1 User is offline   mohitz 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 357
  • Joined: 2008-May-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:India

Posted 2009-April-10, 01:13

Scoring: IMP


In a system of your choice, can you construct a reasonable sequence to 6H?
All your ace are belong to us!
0

#2 User is offline   cherdanno 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,640
  • Joined: 2009-February-16

Posted 2009-April-10, 01:33

Playing with Han, the bidding would start:
1H-2C (std opening; nat or bal, GF)
2H-2S (extra values no extreme shape; ask)
2N-3C (4 spades; ask)
3D-3H (5431 or 5440; ask)
3S-? (5431)
Now North has an interesting problem, but I don't think he is worth a slam force; he would probably invite a heart slam with 4C-4D-4H. South has good trumps but not many controls and a minimum in context, so he would pass. He would not fully appreciate the values of his two jacks.

[I don't think this is interesting to anyone but a good excuse for my to test my system-knowledge.]
"Are you saying that LTC merits a more respectful dismissal?"
0

#3 User is offline   JLOL 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,033
  • Joined: 2008-December-05

Posted 2009-April-10, 01:52

Pfft, like you play with Han anymore :rolleyes:
0

#4 User is offline   Flameous 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 475
  • Joined: 2008-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oulu, Finland
  • Interests:How to find out shape below 2NT.

Posted 2009-April-10, 04:30

This is a really hard slam to bid. First I went through all natural sort of systems with all gadgets I've ever played and one sequence was where it might be _possible_ to bid it.
However in strong club/pass this can be found, but even then it's more about luck and how the specific methods happen to work. Some results merchanting is definetly assumed here :rolleyes:

Here is the most succesful auction I could think of.

Pass! - 1C! (Art 14+, 4+ctrls, Art GF, 3+ ctrls)
1H! - 1S (Relay reversal, 4+H or S single suiter)
1NT! - 2C (4+S, two-suiter or H single suiter)
2D! - 2H (5+H, 4+S)
3D! - 3H (Specifically 4531)
3S! - 4C (4 controls)
4D! - 4H (AK in H)
4NT! - 5C (King of diamonds)
5S! - 6H (Both major queens found, let's roll to the six)

This auction requires a lot of little things to make it possible. First and the most important thing is that responder does the asking, because he can basicly due the reversal be sure of good trumps quality holding JT. Also very luckily the answers on relays can't take you too high here.
0

#5 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-April-10, 06:11

Without any special methods, but with sight of both hands:

1-2
2-2NT
3-3
4-4
4NT-5
6

2 was natural and showed extras
2NT was descriptive. That is, it denied three-card heart support and showed a diamond stop.
3 is one of the few fourth-suit bids that I'd play as natural

Responder's decision to move over 4 looks a bit pushy, but he knows the hands fit well. Opener's failure to bid 3NT over 3 suggests good hearts and no club honour.

After 4, opener can appreciate the value of J, because it's opposite the ace or king. He also knows his diamond holding is pulling its weight, because it's opposite a stopper.

If I had this auction in real life, I'd be quite pleased.

This post has been edited by gnasher: 2009-April-10, 06:11

... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#6 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2009-April-10, 07:40

gnasher, on Apr 10 2009, 07:11 AM, said:

Without any special methods, but with sight of both hands:

1-2
2-2NT
3-3
4-4
4NT-5
6

I was about to suggest the same auction. The only pushy/questionable call seems to be 4, but when opener has been able to complete his shape (with 3) and then fails to bid 3N over 3, it seems reasonable to me. Also like gnasher, I'd be pretty pleased to find this at the table.

Edit: I should also add that I'm more comfortable with opener's reverse in a limited opening bid system. In standard, reversing after responder has bid your singleton might be pushy, but that depends a bit on your post-2/1 reverse style/agreements.
0

#7 User is offline   RichMor 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 279
  • Joined: 2008-July-15
  • Location:North Central US

Posted 2009-April-10, 08:47

Mostly agree with gnasher's analysis although I would respond with 2 instead of 2.

The auction would develop on the same lines:
1 - 2
2 - 2NT
3 - 3
where 3 completes opener's pattern and 3 shows some support.

Responder now knows that the Club Ace is facing shortness and the Diamond suit is facing probable 3-card length. Opener now knows that the KJx in Diamonds is a useful holding facing a decent Diamond suit - something opener would not know if responder had initialy bid 2.

But who makes a slam try and how ?

If opener launches RKCB, before or after some cue bids, the 5 response could be the actual hand or:
)Axx )JT )AQxx )Kxxx
where slam is not so hot.

If responder launches RKCB opener's reply could be the actual hand or:
AJxx AQxxx )KJx x
where again slam is not good.

A straight cue bidding approach won't help either facing the alternate hand for responder.

If you get there, good for you mate. :rolleyes:
0

#8 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-April-10, 09:35

RichMor, on Apr 10 2009, 03:47 PM, said:

But who makes a slam try and how ?

If opener launches RKCB, before or after some cue bids, the 5 response could be the actual hand or:
)Axx )JT )AQxx )Kxxx
where slam is not so hot.

Responder clearly shouldn't make a slam try on this, knowing that he's opposite a 4531 shape.

Quote

If responder launches RKCB opener's reply could be the actual hand or:
AJxx AQxxx )KJx x
where again slam is not good.

Slam is OK opposite that. However, that sort of consideration is the reason that responder's slam try, if he makes one, should be 4, which says something useful about his hand.

You seem to be conflating the terms "make a slam try" and "launch RKCB". They are different things: a slam try says "I'm interested in slam. What do you think?" RKCB says "I want to know how many aces you have."
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#9 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-April-10, 09:44

N      S
         1 (Strong)
1NT - 2 (12-14 Bal. or 15+ Any; Relay Asking)
2 - 2 (12-14 Bal.; Relay)
3 - 4 (32=4=4; Relay)
4 - 4 (3=2=4=4; Relay)
5 - 5 (5 Controls; Relay)
6 - 6 (K or All other Kings; Signoff)
Pass - *Cringe*

This requires insanely agressive bidding from South... I think I would only be in 3NT however.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#10 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-April-10, 09:58

Just because I have nothing to add to the natural auction, TOSR with reverse relays seems to work extremely well.

1 - 1 - (16+, 8+ balanced or red suits)
2NT - 3 - (3 suited short clubs narrowed to a few particular shapes and can't have stiff honor, asking)
3 - 3 - (4531, asking)
3 - 4 - (5 or fewer controls, asking)
4 - 4 - (AK or neither in hearts, asking)
4 - 6 (AK or neither in spades, responder essentially knows opener's exact hand including jacks to make up 16 hcp)
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#11 User is offline   PrecisionL 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,022
  • Joined: 2004-March-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Knoxville, TN, USA
  • Interests:Emerald LM (7500+ MP)
    God
    Family
    Counseling
    Bridge
    Statistics

Posted 2009-April-10, 11:49

Playing ULTRA CLUB:

1 (16+) - 1 (4+ or balanced, G.F.)
1 (Relay) - 1NT (Balanced 8-13)
2 (Transfer Stayman) - 3 (Max and 3=2=4=4)
3NT (minimum) - 4 (5 controls + Q to make 12-13 hcp) Edited
(9 controls, slam possible with good fit and singleton if no wastage in clubs)
(a) 5 (CAB) - 5 (Ace, but not the K)
6 (Eureka! Assuming no  loser and behind in the match) p p p

OR (b) pass 4 (assuming ahead in the match)

Whoops, revision needed!? Tough Hand!!!
Ultra Relay: see Daniel's web page: https://bridgewithda...19/07/Ultra.pdf
C3: Copious Canape Club is still my favorite system. (Ultra upgraded, PM for notes)

Santa Fe Precision published 8/19. TOP3 published 11/20. Magic experiment (Science Modernized) with Lenzo. 2020: Jan Eric Larsson's Cottontail . 2020. BFUN (Bridge For the UNbalanced) 2021: Weiss Simplified (Canape & Relay). 2022: Canary Modernized, 2023-4: KOK Canape, 2025-6: Canape!
0

#12 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-April-10, 11:52

No.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#13 User is offline   Flameous 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 475
  • Joined: 2008-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oulu, Finland
  • Interests:How to find out shape below 2NT.

Posted 2009-April-10, 14:31

lol, ken was the first one to give straight honest answer ;) But we all gave it a try!
0

#14 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-April-10, 15:05

Flameous, on Apr 10 2009, 03:31 PM, said:

lol, ken was the first one to give straight honest answer :D But we all gave it a try!

The reason is that he was listing his auction with explanations, but it reached the maximum number of lines allowed in one post. ;)
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#15 User is offline   mohitz 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 357
  • Joined: 2008-May-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:India

Posted 2009-April-10, 16:06

thanks all.. gnasher's sequence looks okay in a standard setting.
All your ace are belong to us!
0

#16 User is offline   Mbodell 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,871
  • Joined: 2007-April-22
  • Location:Santa Clara, CA

Posted 2009-April-10, 19:16

1 - 1 (16+;8+bal or reds)
1NT - 2 (r;same rank 4432)
2 - 3 (r;3244)
3nt - 4 (to play; my hand was really good with 5 controls)
4 - 5 (where?; one of top 2 in every suit but hearts)
6 (may as well try it)

This might be the way I'd get here. I think South tries to sign off and North pushes them higher and South hopes it wasn't K and A and hopes there's luck in diamonds too (Q on side or with partner).
0

#17 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-April-11, 03:24

Mbodell, on Apr 11 2009, 02:16 AM, said:

1 - 1 (16+;8+bal or reds)
1NT - 2 (r;same rank 4432)
2 - 3 (r;3244)
3nt - 4 (to play; my hand was really good with 5 controls)
4 - 5 (where?; one of top 2 in every suit but hearts)
6 (may as well try it)

This might be the way I'd get here. I think South tries to sign off and North pushes them higher and South hopes it wasn't K and A and hopes there's luck in diamonds too (Q on side or with partner).

And hopes that partner has J.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#18 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2009-April-13, 07:24

I wouldn't reach 6. Most likely, would end up in 3NT.
0

#19 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-April-13, 12:15

I honestly think I would start with the 1-2-2-2NT-3 sequence.

What now? North should be very interested in slam, lets count: assuming a blank singleton club and 16 HCP on partner's hand, we have 26 HCP combined on the rest, if all we miss is an Ace we should have 12 easy tricks.

Worst of all is to have 2 queens missing, or K+J. Others seem to provide 12 tricks.

Really driving to slam doesn't look wrong.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users