♠Axxx
♥Axxx
♦Axxx
♣A
Partner r/r 1st opens 2♥ showing 5-5 (or more) with hearts and a minor,
You try 2n and partner bids 3♥ showing a max with clubs.
You don't really have any further agreements here, but if you think something is standard, partner will probably be on the same page.
Page 1 of 1
spaces
#2
Posted 2009-March-30, 18:32
I would just bid 6H with no agreements.
New website: http://www.justinlall.com
#3
Posted 2009-March-31, 05:40
I guess, the 2H showes a weak 2-suiter?
Assuming 2H promises a hand, which goes at
most -3, or -2?
I will have 6 tricks for partner, maybe 7.
To get 7, you need to ruff 3 times, and you
cant use hearts to enter your hand, and they
may lead a trump.
Since partner showed a max., chances are high,
that he has a hand, he expects to go down -2 at
most (without help from you), so you should have
a reasonable play for 12 tricks.
The key is of course the precise definition of the
2H opening, you dont need precise agreements
about follow ups, you need to know the band with of
the 2H opening.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: You will be able to enter the hand via diamond
or spade ruffs, so our hand will quite often produce 7
tricks.
Assuming 2H promises a hand, which goes at
most -3, or -2?
I will have 6 tricks for partner, maybe 7.
To get 7, you need to ruff 3 times, and you
cant use hearts to enter your hand, and they
may lead a trump.
Since partner showed a max., chances are high,
that he has a hand, he expects to go down -2 at
most (without help from you), so you should have
a reasonable play for 12 tricks.
The key is of course the precise definition of the
2H opening, you dont need precise agreements
about follow ups, you need to know the band with of
the 2H opening.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: You will be able to enter the hand via diamond
or spade ruffs, so our hand will quite often produce 7
tricks.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#4
Posted 2009-March-31, 06:25
I don't get this. Range?!? What is a "max" when no range is stated?
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#5
Posted 2009-March-31, 09:57
kenrexford, on Mar 31 2009, 07:25 AM, said:
I don't get this. Range?!? What is a "max" when no range is stated?
Let's use our imaginations and pretend it shows less than an opening bid. 6♥.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#6
Posted 2009-March-31, 11:19
I would bid RKC and try to let partner know we have all the keycards. That way partner can bid 7 if he has a decent 6-5 hand.
#7
Posted 2009-March-31, 11:24
How do you know which suit is agreed? I agree with you if you have an agreement on how to do that.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#8
Posted 2009-March-31, 11:53
Sorry, 2♥ showed weak 2 strength, I could have specified.
I think we should play 6-key on this auction, but we definitely weren't playing that, so I blasted 6♥ too.
Everyone gets to move to partner's seat for an awesome play problem.
I think we should play 6-key on this auction, but we definitely weren't playing that, so I blasted 6♥ too.
Everyone gets to move to partner's seat for an awesome play problem.
#9
Posted 2009-March-31, 12:56
jdonn, on Mar 31 2009, 06:24 PM, said:
How do you know which suit is agreed? I agree with you if you have an agreement on how to do that.
4NT would be KC for hearts in my world, since 4♣ would be forcing.
2NT shows a good hand, a maximum with opener is GF.
(You bid 3♣ p/c to stop in openers minor.)
Kind regards,
Harald
Harald
Page 1 of 1

Help

♦Q lead