I don't get it
#1
Posted 2008-June-17, 03:36
AQxxx
AQxx
x
all white imps
1♥-1♠-X-2♠
?
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2008-June-17, 03:58
#4
Posted 2008-June-17, 04:47
[Added] I think this hand is much too powerful for light action. I think that, if Leb is available, 3♠ is still and more right because of the first-round spade control.
-P.J. Painter.
#5
Posted 2008-June-17, 04:51
#8
Posted 2008-June-17, 08:30
pclayton, on Jun 17 2008, 09:27 AM, said:
Agreed and hoping I am playing g/b2NT here
#9
Posted 2008-June-17, 08:44
#10 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-June-17, 11:12
#11
Posted 2008-June-17, 11:27
Jlall, on Jun 17 2008, 01:12 PM, said:
No its not. I wonder if 4♦ is forcing playing that.
#12
Posted 2008-June-17, 14:38
4D.
If you happen to play 2NT as some kind of Lebensohl,
than it is either 3D or 2NT followed by 3D.
As it is, this is certainly not standard, and the hand is
too strong for a simple 3D bid.
This of course assumes, that X showed both minors,
and may not be based on a bal. hand with 10-12.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: 4D is certainly not forcing, but highly invitational.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#13
Posted 2008-June-17, 16:02
George Carlin
#14
Posted 2008-June-17, 16:09
#15
Posted 2008-June-17, 17:09

Help
