Page 1 of 1
Sit Or Run?
#2
Posted 2008-January-30, 19:35
Partner has made a takeout double, so I take it out.
2♠.
If partner's double is penalty, I pass.
2♠.
If partner's double is penalty, I pass.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#3
Posted 2008-January-30, 19:44
Well, that's really the question...
Lacking a specific agreement, what is P likely to have for the 2nd double?
Lacking a specific agreement, what is P likely to have for the 2nd double?
#4
Posted 2008-January-30, 20:23
TylerE, on Jan 30 2008, 08:44 PM, said:
Well, that's really the question...
Lacking a specific agreement, what is P likely to have for the 2nd double?
Lacking a specific agreement, what is P likely to have for the 2nd double?
I'm not sure there is a standard here. There are some people I play with where I wouldn't even dream this is a penalty double, and there are some where I would suspect it is.
Anyway, I bid 2♠. Passing is too risky for me if I don't even know what partner's x is. If I knew it was penalty, I would pass, since I have two trumps I didn't promise. I don't have great experiences passing out penalty doubles like this, though, so I could be easily convinced that 2♠ is better anyway.
#5
Posted 2008-January-31, 03:21
I pass because I have the rule that any x after a penalty double is for penalty.
Am I happy? No not at all, but I do not see why I should be happier in another suit.
Am I happy? No not at all, but I do not see why I should be happier in another suit.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#6
Posted 2008-January-31, 03:46
Hi,
depends on partnership agreement,
I believe that partners double is
for t/o, hence I bid 2S, but I have to
check, ... and I may well be wrong.
With kind regards
Marlowe
depends on partnership agreement,
I believe that partners double is
for t/o, hence I bid 2S, but I have to
check, ... and I may well be wrong.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#7
Posted 2008-January-31, 03:50
You can play dbl as penalties, but I don't think that's technically the best.
#8
Posted 2008-January-31, 05:28
penalty double by my agreements, and pass nowm frightened, but pass. Hopefully 2♦ wasn't really transfer.
#9
Posted 2008-January-31, 08:03
It looks like a penalty double situation to me. Don't know whether I'd leave it. I guess I have no choice but to leave it in.
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
#10
Posted 2008-January-31, 08:21
Must be t/o for the same reason as why most low-level doubles are for t/o: p is more likely to have a hand suited for t/o than for penalties, and also it is more important that he can bid something if he has a t/o double. With a hand suited for penalty double he can pass, or bid 3NT is he really has to.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#11
Posted 2008-January-31, 08:54
I'd bid 2♠. I would tend to interpret this double as takeout if undiscussed, and although that is less likely here, it's certainly not a lock that pard has a penalty double and I think there's a small chance 2♥ may make even if this is the case.
#12
Posted 2008-January-31, 09:53
I bid 2♠. Second double is takeout for me, and event if it isn't, I would be very scared to play 2♥X, more to lose than to gain IMO.
Page 1 of 1

Help

(1NT) - X (Penalty) - (2D) (transfer) - p
(2H) - X - p - ??