BBO Discussion Forums: Strong enough to raise? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Strong enough to raise? J107-9-J1032-J10874 1S-2H-???

Poll: Your bid? (24 member(s) have cast votes)

Your bid?

  1. Pass (15 votes [62.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 62.50%

  2. Double (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. 2 Spades (7 votes [29.17%])

    Percentage of vote: 29.17%

  4. Other (2 votes [8.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   jdeegan 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,427
  • Joined: 2005-August-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Economics
    Finance
    Bridge bidding theory
    Cooking
    Downhill skiing

Posted 2007-January-23, 20:35

Scoring: IMP

1-2-????

:P Opposite competent partner playing standard SAYC. Your bid? Do you have enough to raise?
0

#2 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-January-23, 20:46

YES its good enough. Stiff heart and JT combos are nice.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#3 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-January-23, 20:58

I'd just pass, being THIS light just gets you into more trouble than it's worth.
0

#4 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2007-January-23, 21:30

No. Pass too light by far.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#5 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,070
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-January-23, 21:50

I'd like to have an Ace or a KIng if lite.
0

#6 User is offline   ohioply 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44
  • Joined: 2007-January-09

Posted 2007-January-23, 21:54

if it was white vs red i would raise but red/white or all red i'll pass
0

#7 User is offline   HeartA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,016
  • Joined: 2004-October-17

Posted 2007-January-25, 22:47

I would pass right now. If I got a chance later, I might support.
Senshu
0

#8 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-January-26, 04:29

I pass. The hand is too weak, pard is still unlimited, it's a bad lead director, it doesn't deprive opps of any bid, etc.

In fact, bidding 2 might actually HELP opps showing their hands because it gives LHO the chance to make a take-out double. What is

1 (2) 2 (dbl)

would be

1 (2) pass (???)

without the 2 bid.
0

#9 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2007-January-26, 04:42

Partner will expect a quick trick. You have none. So just pass.
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

#10 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-January-26, 06:52

You don't want to be in 4 to make unless partner has some monster hand in which case he'll bid again. You might want to be in 4 as a sac, if partner doesn't have too much defense.

So I voted "other", as I would bid 3 with a regular p. On a very good day this could make opps make the wrong decision of whether to bid 4. But the main purpose is to describe my hand so that I can respect partner's decision. If he doubles 4 it's pure penalties. If he bids 4 opps might wonder if he expects to make it, but I won't care.

Without discussion I think I would pass, though.

Oh sorry, my vote was wrong, just noticed standard SAYC. So 3 would be a limit raise. So pass.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#11 User is offline   pbleighton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,153
  • Joined: 2003-February-28

Posted 2007-January-26, 09:23

This is entirely a style decision.

I have played in partnerships where I would pass on this
hand.

In both of my current partnerships, a raise to 2M over
competition is purely competitive, so I raise without a
problem.

I play a lot of matchpoints :angry:

Peter
0

#12 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2007-January-26, 09:27

I too would much prefer to be able to raise with these kinds of hands without partner hanging me for competing. But if undiscussed, I can't really raise on that hand.

However, I don't think 3 is all that bad a bid... (if it was weak... is it still a limit raise over competition?)
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

#13 User is offline   joker_gib 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,384
  • Joined: 2004-February-16
  • Location:Belgium

Posted 2007-January-26, 10:00

Pass and bid later if possible
Alain
0

#14 User is offline   fred 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,614
  • Joined: 2003-February-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, USA

Posted 2007-January-26, 10:32

The first question you should ask is:

Does this hand have the values to raise to 2S?

If the answer to this question is "yes" then you should raise.

If the answer to this question is "no" that is not the end of it - there are times in which you should intentionally overbid for tactical reasons.

The answer to this question is partly a function of style and partnership. My guess is that most of the leading players in North America would consider this hand to be not quite strong enough for 2S from a pure values point of view. That's how I see it.

It is fine to say "you plan/hope to raise later", but having not bid 2S you are not going to bid at all unless partner can take another call.

And there are 3 things about your hand that suggest that partner might not take another call on some hands in which your side should be bidding:

1) You have a singleton heart that your partner does not know about. If he has 2 cards in hearts (not unlikely) then his hand is a lot better than he thinks it is. If he has 3 hearts (more likely) and hearts are raised (not unlikely) he will know that you probably have no more than 2 hearts, but he will not know that you have a singleton. Even if his hand and the auction make him think that you probably have a singleton, he might get cautious as a result (because given that you have a singleton heart and 3-card spade support and that you passed over 2H, your actual hand rates about 9.5 out of 10).

2) You have the Jack and 10 of spades. On some marginal hands with 6 spades partner will be less inclined to take action due to the poor texture of his suit.

3) You have strong intermediate cards in the minors. On some marginal 2-suited hands partner will be less inclined to take action due to the poor texture of his second suit.

My judgment suggests that these tactical considerations are more than enough to compensate for my personal answer to the original question being "not quite".

So I would make what I consider to be an intentional slight overbid of 2S.

Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com
0

#15 User is offline   BebopKid 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 230
  • Joined: 2007-January-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Little Rock, Arkansas, USA

Posted 2007-January-26, 15:05

I would bid 2. If the contract stands, I would proudly lay down my cards as dummy.

You can't set 2.


BebopKid (Bryan Lee Williams)

"I've practiced meditation most of my life. It's better than sitting around doing nothing."
(Tom Sims, from topfive.com)

0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users