I think he means after a member of our partnership has limited his strength using a notrump bid. This is most commonly a 1NT response to 1m, but generally does not include a (semi) forcing 1NT in response to 1M. At least this is the use of "notrump" in the set of rules I use, adopted from Ken Gee and Barry Harper.
Double! (No, really Double!)
#22
Posted 2006-June-02, 14:48
jdonn, on Jun 2 2006, 01:30 PM, said:
I still don't believe he intended that auction. Are you sure he didn't mean notrump OPENING bids?
perhaps you're right.. he does say, for the 'N', "after a NT bid" ... but the only example he gives is of a NT opening... so he says "bid", not "opening," but his example is of an opening... he also says that this is not a matter of right or wrong, as long as a p'ship agrees and then has some way to remember their agreements
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#23
Posted 2006-June-02, 20:02
[quote name='Badmonster' date='Jun 1 2006, 08:30 PM'] [/QUOTE]
what about: X X X.
Though that too could give rise to misunderstandings. [/quote]
only if you're over 21
lololololol
DHL
what about: X X X.
Though that too could give rise to misunderstandings. [/quote]
only if you're over 21
lololololol
"That's my story, and I'm sticking to it!"

Help
