Houston, we have liftoff Go, no go line.
#21
Posted 2005-December-08, 15:51
Partner's bidding tells me that I can make 3♠ if I have a Yarborough and 4333.
Roland
#22
Posted 2005-December-08, 18:50
mike777, on Dec 8 2005, 06:20 PM, said:
What hand does x and then 2 spades show?
16+ 4+♠
Quote
16+ normally no 4 card support
Quote
minimum hand without even support (3 cards)
Quote
More than a direct raise to 2♠, so 20-21 with 4♠.
Just to note: when I can make game opposite Qxxx on a suit bid, I don't make non forcing bids, I bid game.
#23
Posted 2005-December-08, 18:53
inquiry, on Dec 8 2005, 06:23 PM, said:
Fluffy, on Dec 8 2005, 01:14 PM, said:
What do you respond to 1♦ X when holding...
♠xxx ♥xx ♦xxxxx ♣xxx
Just curios. Don't you bid 1♠? A nice 4th spade isn't just a normal holding, it is considerably better than you could have.
As I said, 4th ♠ is an extra, just not good enough.
#24
Posted 2005-December-08, 23:52
inquiry, on Dec 8 2005, 01:23 PM, said:
Fluffy, on Dec 8 2005, 01:14 PM, said:
What do you respond to 1♦ X when holding...
♠xxx ♥xx ♦xxxxx ♣xxx
Just curios. Don't you bid 1♠? A nice 4th spade isn't just a normal holding, it is considerably better than you could have.
But this raises an interesting question. I use the 2♦ cue-bid as a general force, that doesn't promise support. But if you paly 2♦ as 100% sure spade fit, which bid over 2♦ double do you play as weaker, pass (as occurred here) or 2♠ bid? If 2♦ forced to 2♠, then pass should (at least imho) show the better hand. Within such a context, this hand is not "better" than promised.
I have a "pet" trick here. I bid 2C. This is the bid least likely to get partner excited about his hand. The times 2C gets doubled, I can run to 2S and at least partner has a clue as to what I have.
Winston
#25
Posted 2005-December-08, 23:56
#26
Posted 2005-December-09, 00:18
#27
Posted 2005-December-09, 01:06
Winstonm, on Dec 9 2005, 12:56 AM, said:
<!-- ONEHAND begin --><table border='1'> <tr> <td> <table> <tr> <td> Dealer: </td> <td> ????? </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Vul: </td> <td> ???? </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Scoring: </td> <td> Unknown </td> </tr> </table> </td> <td> <table> <tr> <th> <span class='spades'> ♠ </span> </th> <td> AK432 </td> </tr> <tr> <th> <span class='hearts'> ♥ </span> </th> <td> AQ94 </td> </tr> <tr> <th> <span class='diamonds'> ♦ </span> </th> <td> 3 </td> </tr> <tr> <th> <span class='clubs'> ♣ </span> </th> <td> KQ3 </td> </tr> </table> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table><!-- ONEHAND end -->
oh ya partner cannot have this little.
This bidding must show exactly 24.31415926 total points no matter how irrational many may think this number is.
#28
Posted 2005-December-09, 01:32
Winstonm, on Dec 9 2005, 12:56 AM, said:
|
|
Hi,
why not bid 3S over 2C.
3S shows this hand, you need next to
nothing to make 4S, and 3S tells this.
If you believe, that the hand is stronger
bid 4S or 4D, assuming that 4D is a
splinter agreeing spades.
The cue bidding is just pointless noise.
You need magic cards, to make the
slam playable and no wastage in diamonds.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#29
Posted 2005-December-09, 02:15
inquiry, on Dec 8 2005, 11:14 AM, said:
agree with ben.

Help
