Ingberman/Lebensohl over openers reverse
#1
Posted Today, 08:12
Instead, I'd love to hear what you are currently playing (and if you are in an SLTP, please mention that in your reply).
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#3
Posted Today, 10:07
#4
Posted Today, 11:34
pescetom, on 2026-November-13, 10:07, said:
That's what the heading says
(Surely you didn't think I'd leave out those critical details?)
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#5
Posted Today, 11:36
We play that repetition is weak and non forcing with 5 cards whereas 2NT is the French convention Moderateur, weak without 5 cards: with a minimum reverse, Opener will repeat his opening minor giving Responder the chance to pass or raise Opener's second suit. Anything else is game forcing.
My understanding is that Ingberman is similar but Opener with a minimum reverse will always bid 3♣, even if he opened 1♦.
#6
Posted Today, 11:53
#7
Posted Today, 13:09
DavidKok, on 2026-November-13, 11:53, said:
forcing but can be weak, How do you unravel that?
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#8
Posted Today, 13:20
jillybean, on 2026-November-13, 13:09, said:
With a min reverse, opener can bid 2NT, 3 of their suit, or sometimes bid 3 of responder s major with 5422 and no stopper. With a 3-cd fit, you usually want to play game in resp suit (so you bid it with a min reverse and splinter with a max, everyone knows the shortage but you can help responder to go to slam if not min).
#9
Posted Today, 15:19
I play inbermam, although in a lot of situations it is the same as lebensohl.
As for auctions such as 1D 1S 2 H 2S, it’s far more efficient o play this as 5+ with no strength implications (fixed a typo)than to play it as weak. Just go through the various permutations and it should be obvious.
As for how you untangle it, opener makes a natural rebid which is descriptive but non forcing and responder does whatever looks best to him. The exception would be a monster hand for opener with 3 card spade support. Now he won’t usually risk 3S over 2S. He’ll bid 4S (on most hands).
I’ve discussed this with some decent flight B players who used the major rebid as weak. I gave them a few example hands where responder had gf values opposite a reverse and they simply got lost after having to manufacture a bid because they feared opener passing 2M.
#10
Posted Today, 15:39
mikeh, on 2026-November-13, 15:19, said:
I play inbermam, although in a lot of situations it is the same as lebensohl.
As for auctions such as 1D 1S 2 H 2S, it’s far more efficient o play this as 5+ with no strength imo,icatiins than to play it as weak. Just go through the various permutations and it should be obvious.
As for how you untangle it, opener makes a natural rebid which is descriptive but non forcing and responder does whatever looks best to him. The exception would be a monster hand for opener with 3 card spade support. Now he won’t usually risk 3S over 2S. He’ll bid 4S (on most hands).
I’ve discussed this with some decent flight B players who used the major rebid as weak. I gave them a few example hands where responder had gf values opposite a reverse and they simply got lost after having to manufacture a bid because they feared opener passing 2M.
I have no idea about either SLPT or icatiins (but ica**i in Italian is pretty clear
I am probably equivalent to an ACBL flight B player and I use the major rebid as weak (although as I said many here play it forcing and I could live with that too).
IIUC you are asking what happens with GF values and spades in the auction where 2S is weak NF:
1D - 1S
2H - ?
With 6 spades I would bid 3S (GF) and with 5 spades I would bid 2NT then 3S (now GF).
#11
Posted Today, 16:54
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#12
Posted Today, 16:54
pescetom, on 2026-November-13, 15:39, said:
I am probably equivalent to an ACBL flight B player and I use the major rebid as weak (although as I said many here play it forcing and I could live with that too).
IIUC you are asking what happens with GF values and spades in the auction where 2S is weak NF:
1D - 1S
2H - ?
With 6 spades I would bid 3S (GF) and with 5 spades I would bid 2NT then 3S (now GF).
I also learned the rebid of the major as weak. Root-Pavlicek, "Structured Reverses." I find it works fine.Decades old.
Gf with 5 of the major goes thru fourth suit. Not 2NT, which is always artificial and weak.Again this is old stuff but it works, I know it, most importantly.
However this is definitely not expert standard in ACBL. Expert standard is as DavidK and MikeH described it.
I thought I was the only one who had no idea what SLPT was
#13
Posted Today, 16:56
pescetom, on 2026-November-13, 15:39, said:
I am probably equivalent to an ACBL flight B player and I use the major rebid as weak (although as I said many here play it forcing and I could live with that too).
IIUC you are asking what happens with GF values and spades in the auction where 2S is weak NF:
1D - 1S
2H - ?
With 6 spades I would bid 3S (GF) and with 5 spades I would bid 2NT then 3S (now GF).
2NT is a relay to 3♣ and now 3♠ is GF?
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)

Help
