jillybean, on 2026-November-08, 08:29, said:
1♥-1♠;
2♦-?
1♣: 2+, may have longer diamonds than clubs (up to 4 diamonds) in a balanced hand.
1♦: 4-way: 1) natural, diamonds, Walsh style; 2) 0-7 'any' hand without a more descriptive alternative1; 3) 8-11 hcp 4=4 in the majors; 4) 8+ hcp balanced no-major, waiting bid.
1♥: 2-way: 1) natural, clubs-hearts unbalanced (5(+)♣4(+)♥ or exactly 4=4=1=4); 2) 12-13 balanced.
1♠: Asking to describe further - denies the weakest part of option 2 (they break away here to a strain) and all of option 3 (rebid 1NT) of the 1♦ bid.
2♦: 4♠, 4♥, unbalanced, primary clubs (so 4=4=1=4 or 4=4=0=5), 11-15.
I said 'least favourable' because responder usually has diamonds on this auction, so we're not in a good spot. If responder instead bid 1M, 1NT or 2♣ over 1♣ we are in a much better position, having found a fit (a major in the first case, clubs in the second and third). Arguably 1♣-2♦ is even worse (see below) but at least the bidding is easy: we have to pass and pray.
1The alternatives for me are:
Pass: 0-4(5) with 4(-5) clubs, prefers 1♣ to 1NT opposite 17-19 balanced.
2♦: 4-8 with 6(+)♦
2♥: 4-8 with 6(+)♥
2♠: 4-8 with 6(+)♠

Help
