Page 1 of 1
Is it possible in this hand to go in a club contract?
#4
Posted 2026-August-18, 13:42
#6
Posted 2026-August-18, 15:22
cencio, on 2026-August-18, 13:16, said:
North bid first 1 club
So it depends upon your agreements and style whether South uncontested would bid 1♦ or 1♥ and then how North rebids and how you handle XYN...
Was North dealer (put it in the diagram, please) or did South and/or West pass first?
Did East bid his hearts?
With decent agreements you should not miss at least game in clubs or 5♠X.
If North is dealer and East is unusually aggressive then with Italian control-bidding it might go:
1♣ (1♥) - 3NT
4♣ - 4♦
4♥ - 4♠
and then whatever your agreements you reach 6♣, for better or worse.
#7
Posted 2026-August-18, 18:04
mike777, on 2026-August-18, 14:58, said:
Sure it is possible, why not?
Possible but not likely.
North opens 1♣
Many E/W's will pass with those hands.
South bids 1 RED suit
North bid 1nt
South bids 2 or 3nt
It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#8
Posted 2026-August-18, 18:30
#9
Posted 2026-August-19, 00:04
Uncontested my Transfer Walsh approach will find the 9-card club fit, but I'd struggle to get to 5♣ let alone the 6♣ available and may end up stopping in 3N
As East I have 2-suited overcalls available so with East's hand I would intervene at this vulnerability with 2♥ as 45xx.
South then bids 2♠ (minor suit takeout), West competes to 3♠. North now has the choice of 3N/x♣.
If competition continues to 4♠ then I'd perhaps expect a doubled contract rather than 5/6♣.
Overall I'd expect a spread of outcomes in play.
As East I have 2-suited overcalls available so with East's hand I would intervene at this vulnerability with 2♥ as 45xx.
South then bids 2♠ (minor suit takeout), West competes to 3♠. North now has the choice of 3N/x♣.
If competition continues to 4♠ then I'd perhaps expect a doubled contract rather than 5/6♣.
Overall I'd expect a spread of outcomes in play.
#10
Posted 2026-August-19, 04:17
mw64ahw, on 2026-August-19, 00:04, said:
Uncontested my Transfer Walsh approach will find the 9-card club fit, but I'd struggle to get to 5♣ let alone the 6♣ available and may end up stopping in 3N
As East I have 2-suited overcalls available so with East's hand I would intervene at this vulnerability with 2♥ as 45xx.
South then bids 2♠ (minor suit takeout), West competes to 3♠. North now has the choice of 3N/x♣.
If competition continues to 4♠ then I'd perhaps expect a doubled contract rather than 5/6♣.
Overall I'd expect a spread of outcomes in play.
As East I have 2-suited overcalls available so with East's hand I would intervene at this vulnerability with 2♥ as 45xx.
South then bids 2♠ (minor suit takeout), West competes to 3♠. North now has the choice of 3N/x♣.
If competition continues to 4♠ then I'd perhaps expect a doubled contract rather than 5/6♣.
Overall I'd expect a spread of outcomes in play.
6♣ is a desperately poor contract, you need very specific heart layouts for it to have much play.
Where we would end up would depend if E intervened over our weak NT, but unopposed the bad news is we'd be in 3N, the good news is that it would likely be on a heart lead.
If we were EW, if N opened 1♣ we would overcall 2♥. If it was 3+ cards, this would be natural and weak, if it was 2+ would be 44/45/54 majors.
#11
Posted 2026-August-30, 11:03
jillybean, on 2026-August-18, 18:04, said:
Possible but not likely.
North opens 1♣
Many E/W's will pass with those hands.
South bids 1 RED suit
North bid 1nt
South bids 2 or 3nt
North opens 1♣
Many E/W's will pass with those hands.
South bids 1 RED suit
North bid 1nt
South bids 2 or 3nt
If the North-South style is to bid four card spade suits over 1C P 1H then I don't think South's invitation should be in notrump. North's 1NT bid denies 4S (in those partnerships) and denies 4H so the club bid has to be at least 4 cards. When you make an invitation, you should be happy in your contract if partner passes. I'm a lot happier in 3C than in 2NT and 3C is correct on values.
Those players who bid 1NT with 4-3-3-3 (with 4S) can't jump to 3C. However, many can do some sort of checkback and if partner denies 4 spades, they can now invite with 3C.
Inviting with 3C also helps sometimes when partner accepts. Say partner has xxx, AK, Axx, Kxxxx. 3NT is automatic after 1C-1H-1NT-2NT, but if partner bids 3C instead, North should bid 3D and even if you don't reach the club game, you'll probably get a decent score for playing in clubs. However, if partner bids 3D which likely shows spade weakness, I think you can bid the club game. So, yes, against silent opponents, I think you should reach clubs unless your system is unfortunate for this hand.
Page 1 of 1

Help
Add Reply
MultiQuote