We would start 1♦-1♥-1♠-X showing 4 clubs if we didn't jump to 4♥ immediately, I suspect we would rapidly be in 5♣
So much fun
#22
Posted 2026-July-24, 10:29
Cyberyeti, on 2026-July-24, 01:50, said:
We would start 1♦-1♥-1♠-X showing 4 clubs if we didn't jump to 4♥ immediately, I suspect we would rapidly be in 5♣
Specifically 4 clubs , are you playing NFB's?
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#24
Posted 2026-July-24, 12:49
Can't we all just play standard.
Is 2x non forcing?
This is similar to 1m (1M) X method that denies 4M (Justin Lall) I think it is very descriptive but only one partner will play that, so far.
Is 2x non forcing?
This is similar to 1m (1M) X method that denies 4M (Justin Lall) I think it is very descriptive but only one partner will play that, so far.
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#25
Posted 2026-July-24, 13:17
I do play that on (1♦)-1♥-(1♠)-?, a bid of 2♣ is not forcing. Meanwhile, X for me shows real clubs as well as hearts tolerance - normally exactly Hx in hearts, but I did not play that convention with all partners.

Help
