Another interesting one from the club
#21
Posted Yesterday, 14:01
After that who knows.
#22
Posted Yesterday, 14:02
P_Marlowe, on 2025-August-26, 13:52, said:
At one point in time, you need to tell p, that you have a min for your bidding.
As it is you are also denying a club control, which you dont have.
If slam is on, p needs to have Qx in hearts and a club control, he will move on,
if he happens to look at those.
I agree. 4H at this point is automatic.
#23
Posted Yesterday, 14:43
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#24
Posted Yesterday, 14:49
smerriman, on 2025-August-26, 13:05, said:
Right

"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#26
Posted Yesterday, 15:04
jillybean, on 2025-August-26, 11:04, said:
There is a delete button for multi posts
The problem is not so much the server(s) but the hosting (IBM?), also the specific server bug we all identified (two years ago?).
I use the delete button when I can, which means when I can reach a PC (as now) and avoid the forum bug.
There is a lot BBO could do to improve the situation.
#27
Posted Yesterday, 15:07
pescetom, on 2025-August-26, 15:04, said:
I use the delete button when I can, which means when I can reach a PC (as now) and avoid the forum bug.
There is a lot BBO could do to improve the situation.
If anything it seems getting on is even more of a hassle, the forums freezing
#28
Posted Yesterday, 15:07
jillybean, on 2025-August-26, 14:49, said:

Yes, how else would you bid a super strong 5-5 in the reds, if you're not opening 1♥? And if partner has, say, 2 hearts and 3 diamonds, what do they bid over 3♦ (are you wanting them to raise with 3, when you might have 4 like here)?
I would have opened 1♥ anyway, but if stronger..
#29
Posted Yesterday, 19:20
mike777, on 2025-August-26, 14:56, said:
I don't cue shortage in partners 1st suit
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#31
Posted Yesterday, 21:48
smerriman, on 2025-August-26, 15:07, said:
I would have opened 1♥ anyway, but if stronger..
2 suited hands are difficult to bid after a 2C opening, we would open 2C and rebid 2nt or open 1M and disregard the 5 card minor
2C 2D 2M is a 6 bagger
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#32
Posted Yesterday, 21:52
mike777, on 2025-August-26, 19:55, said:
We can't have it both ways.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#34
Posted Today, 00:29
jillybean, on 2025-August-26, 21:48, said:
2C 2D 2M is a 6 bagger
Good, you showed the 6-4, and denied 3 cards in spade, and agreed on hearts being trump.
4H is still the bid.
Given that you dont cue shortage in p suit, the 4H bid will also deny any spade honor p
is missing.
The problem with 4D is, that there is not much room between 4D and 4H.
If p needs a diamond control to move, he should assume you have one, you did bid 3D.
If you dont have a spade top honor, and no club control, this would imply
QJx both in clubs and diamond and nothing in spade, what was your 2C bid based on?
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)