BBO Discussion Forums: How should I get GIB to cooperate? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

How should I get GIB to cooperate?

#1 User is offline   thorvald 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 376
  • Joined: 2012-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 2022-October-13, 13:23



5♣ is explained as 5+♦ and strong rebiddable ♣

No funny going down in 5♣, where 6♦ is making
Thorvald Aagaard
Mobile : +45 22 99 55 25
http://www.netbridge.dk
http://www.thorvald.dk
0

#2 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,678
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted 2022-October-13, 14:38

You could at least humour him with 5♦ rather than pass?
0

#3 User is offline   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,731
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-October-13, 15:14

View Postpescetom, on 2022-October-13, 14:38, said:

You could at least humour him with 5♦ rather than pass?

I assume the diagram was wrong and the dealer was South, not North, and it's the robot that passed 5♣. And that the robot actually had 13 cards (rather than the 12 shown).

I also expect 5♣ will probably be incomprehensible / undefined to the robot, regardless of what the description says.
I have nothing worth contributing, bye
0

#4 User is offline   johnu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,480
  • Joined: 2008-September-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-October-13, 15:35

GIB's pass of 5♣ is known as a negative preference bid. This bid is a cornerstone of the 2 card major system.
1

#5 User is offline   thorvald 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 376
  • Joined: 2012-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 2022-October-13, 16:18

View Postsmerriman, on 2022-October-13, 15:14, said:

I assume the diagram was wrong and the dealer was South, not North, and it's the robot that passed 5♣. And that the robot actually had 13 cards (rather than the 12 shown).

I also expect 5♣ will probably be incomprehensible / undefined to the robot, regardless of what the description says.


Diagram fixed and 5♣ is defined (based on the explanation)
Thorvald Aagaard
Mobile : +45 22 99 55 25
http://www.netbridge.dk
http://www.thorvald.dk
0

#6 User is offline   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,731
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-October-13, 16:47

As mentioned in the past, the fact it shows a description doesn't mean it's a defined bid. But it may be; will check this later.
I have nothing worth contributing, bye
0

#7 User is offline   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,731
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-October-13, 18:44

Well, basic GIB at a bidding table bids 5♦, so the book bid is correct.

Older GIB also has 5♦ as the book bid. When it attempts to simulate, it can't find a single hand that is remotely close to what it thinks South is showing, thus also makes the book bid of 5♦. That's mainly because it thinks to bid 5 of a minor you need a combined 29 points, and it has promised none, but 1♦ also had a maximum of 22, which is a contradiction. It merges those in the description to exactly 22 points, but clearly still can't understand it.

Who knows why your robot strayed from the book bid; maybe it found a single hand which it thought was close enough, and on that hand, 5♣ was fine. Or maybe it crashed while failing to simulate any hands, and ended up passing rather than making the book bid.
I have nothing worth contributing, bye
0

#8 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,697
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2022-October-13, 18:53

The "pass" is merely the manifestation of a much greater problem. NOONE defines every possible sequence and the mere idea is poor at best. If GIB does not know what a bid means it should assume natural and do the best it can (like a gasp human). Stop letting GIB pass in 42 (OR WORSE) fits if it is at all possible to go to another place even if it is at a higher level.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users