BBO Discussion Forums: Vugraph Schedule - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Vugraph Schedule

#1 User is offline   mrdct 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,448
  • Joined: 2003-October-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Moama, NSW

Posted 2005-May-09, 20:15

The new vugraph schedule presenting session times in the users' local time zone is a great innovation. One slight annoyance, however, is that once a scheduled session has started it drops off the schedule.

It would be nice if the vugraph schedule didn't drop sessions off until about, say, 3 hours after the advertised starting time.
Disclaimer: The above post may be a half-baked sarcastic rant intended to stimulate discussion and it does not necessarily coincide with my own views on this topic.
I ♦ bidding the suit below the suit I'm actually showing not to be described as a "transfer" for the benefit of people unfamiliar with the concept of a transfer
0

#2 User is offline   Walddk 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,190
  • Joined: 2003-September-30
  • Location:London, England
  • Interests:Cricket

Posted 2005-May-09, 20:21

It used to drop off immediately afterwards, right enough, but I know that Gerardo has changed it to 1½ hours after that particular session has started. It's trivial to make corrections I am told. 3 hours really needed though?

Roland
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice
0

#3 User is offline   mrdct 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,448
  • Joined: 2003-October-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Moama, NSW

Posted 2005-May-09, 21:24

Most BBO vugraph sessions are 16 boards, which can take anything from 2 hours to 2.5 hours. With a few 20+ board sessions floating around, 3 hours should ensure that most sessions in-progress remain in the schedule until they are over.

Further "bells & whistles" would be for a session that is in-progress to be notated as such by being a different colour and/or flashing.
Disclaimer: The above post may be a half-baked sarcastic rant intended to stimulate discussion and it does not necessarily coincide with my own views on this topic.
I ♦ bidding the suit below the suit I'm actually showing not to be described as a "transfer" for the benefit of people unfamiliar with the concept of a transfer
0

#4 User is offline   joker_gib 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,384
  • Joined: 2004-February-16
  • Location:Belgium

Posted 2005-May-10, 02:27

mrdct, on May 9 2005, 10:24 PM, said:

3 hours should ensure that most sessions in-progress remain in the schedule until they are over.

Agree that it's a good idea !

:)

Alain
Alain
0

#5 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2005-May-10, 04:14

For the Norwegian Club championships only the single matches were shown (32 boards) so it did not say when the second half would start. Perhaps for matches with 2 halves perhaps try to make seperate entries even if the starting time might not be 100% accurate.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#6 User is offline   Gerardo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 2,525
  • Joined: 2003-February-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dartmouth, NS, Canada

Posted 2005-May-10, 04:22

3 hours seems a bit too much to me? But really depends on session length.

Also, a "Running" mark would mean "Should be running according to schedule" instead of "Really running"

#7 User is offline   Walddk 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,190
  • Joined: 2003-September-30
  • Location:London, England
  • Interests:Cricket

Posted 2005-May-10, 06:55

On several occasions have Fred and I underlined that all sessions starting times are approximate. We can not and will not guarantee that all sessions start on schedule (they rarely do), and we can't even promise that the broadcasts will happen at all.

We have seen that a few times recently, and that is obviously beyond the control and responsibility of BBO.

Roland
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice
0

#8 User is offline   Gerardo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 2,525
  • Joined: 2003-February-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dartmouth, NS, Canada

Posted 2005-May-10, 10:22

Running is now there, for started (according to schedule) sessions, still for 1:30

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users