"Just Declare" Is Not Real Bridge
#1
Posted 2018-June-21, 23:45
If other people want to play silly fake bridge, OK, but how about restoring the free tournaments of real bridge that got butted off the list? Surely there is room for them.
#2
Posted 2018-June-22, 01:18
#3
Posted 2018-June-22, 01:42
But they're fun, and different people enjoy different things. Appreciate what you have
Besides, given the limit on 3 free tournaments a week, you're still able to play exactly the same number of non-just-declare tournaments a week as before.
#4
Posted 2018-June-22, 07:32
I know AI is tough and hats off to the programmers.
#5
Posted 2018-June-22, 11:33
helene_t, on 2018-June-22, 01:18, said:
Even though you don't have to "bid" with GIB, you have to play the hand in a GIB bid contract which are not always pretty. If you can make some of those contracts you are really beyond a world class player.
#6
Posted 2018-June-23, 04:47
#7
Posted 2018-June-23, 06:26
USViking, on 2018-June-21, 23:45, said:
I could not agree more. I like to play some robot tournaments and accept there is a limit to free play. All the more reason not to pollute these opportunities with nonsense.
Maarten Baltussen
#8
Posted 2018-June-23, 07:14
#9
Posted 2018-June-23, 08:51
I play all kinds of things on BBO - tournaments, just declare things, bingo, goulash etc. I enjoy them. Having fun is not nonsense. Someone's not having fun? You have my sympathy.
#10
Posted 2018-June-23, 09:37
#12
Posted 2018-June-23, 20:16
helene_t, on 2018-June-22, 01:18, said:
GIB bugs should be the subject of another thread, but as I said, fine, let those who enjoy Just Bid have the opportunity to do so.
Again, though, my question is why should my own opportunity to play GIB real bridge with a real auction be taken way?
#13
Posted 2018-June-23, 20:34
smerriman, on 2018-June-22, 01:42, said:
This is a reasonable point to make, and I would prefer a non-preferential system where all players have equal chances concerning hand qulaity
However, the bidding and play exactly resemble "real bridge".
smerriman, on 2018-June-22, 01:42, said:
I think the correct way to express it is that the human player is compared to dozens of other humans' results, but that hundreds of other humans play different cards.
I wonder if there are technical reasons for not having an entire field of hundreds thousands play the same cards. I can't imagine any other reason not to do so.
smerriman, on 2018-June-22, 01:42, said:
Skip the speechifying.
smerriman, on 2018-June-22, 01:42, said:
I thought my opportunities had been reduced.
#15
Posted 2018-June-23, 20:41
FrankerZ, on 2018-June-23, 04:47, said:
Thanks for providing the details. I have been so wrapped up with pay-to-play that I lost touch, and now that I want to play a few more freebies (but little if any less pfp) it is disappointing to see the opportunities reduced.
#16
Posted 2018-June-23, 20:56
boyko, on 2018-June-23, 07:14, said:
But only declarer skills.
boyko, on 2018-June-23, 07:14, said:
Not with 2/3 of the skill categories (bidding and defense) completely left out, it isn't!
boyko, on 2018-June-23, 07:14, said:
I can't speak for anyone else, but for me they are for the joy of experiencing one of the greatest mental challenges ever invented. So much the better that I don't have to be a very good player!
boyko, on 2018-June-23, 07:14, said:
I can't speak for anyone else, but I would play as much as ever if BBO MPs were abolished.
#17
Posted 2018-June-23, 21:00
steve2005, on 2018-June-23, 09:37, said:
It would be real bridge if the three GIBs and the one human all got randomly dealt cards, with no "best hand" favoritism for the human.
#18
Posted 2018-June-23, 21:35
USViking, on 2018-June-23, 20:16, said:
I'm not affiliated with BBO in any way, but based on all the evidence over time, the number of free daylongs was reduced as they were putting too much load on the server given the number of registrants. That is the reason one has to replace the other, and you can't have both.
Based on the numbers of people I saw (and continue to see) registering, Just Declare is just as popular as the other formats. So it would more unfair to get rid of it just for the minority of people who are annoyed by it.
#19
Posted 2018-June-23, 22:07
smerriman, on 2018-June-23, 21:35, said:
I'm not affiliated with BBO in any way, but based on all the evidence over time, the number of free daylongs was reduced as they were putting too much load on the server given the number of registrants. That is the reason one has to replace the other, and you can't have both.
In OP I suggested that server load should not be an issue. I was speaking out of my depth, and it was not my business, and I should not have said anything about it.
But if you are not affiliated with BBO either then I am not sure you are in a better position to broach the issue.
smerriman, on 2018-June-23, 21:35, said:
I have NOT said anything about getting rid of anything.
And as for the numbers registering I would like to know a lot more. If this Just Declare item is more popular than what it replaced, then naturally it deserves priority. But if it is just "as popular" then I don't see why it should be preferred.
#20
Posted 2018-June-23, 23:00
USViking, on 2018-June-23, 22:07, said:
I've followed along with the discussions, the announcements, the reactions to the announcements, and experienced the server crashes. You can wait for the same answer officially if you want (or look up the previous discussions).
USViking, on 2018-June-23, 22:07, said:
My point was simply that you can't have both at the same time, so restoring MP/IMP on the days they were replaced is equivalent to getting rid of Just Declare.
USViking, on 2018-June-23, 22:07, said:
It isn't getting priority. Just Declare is two days a week; IMP is two days a week; MP (preferred by most) is 3 days a week.
Either you're asking for multiple free tournaments on the same day (ruled out for reasons mentioned above), or for the 2 days of Just Declare to be removed, which would be completely unfair. Which is it?