BBO Discussion Forums: Two lead problems - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Two lead problems 31 IMPs on the line...

#1 User is offline   zenbiddist 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 2013-May-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2015-June-28, 08:40

Your first board against new opponents. Your lead to 6 (yes, Australian preempts are loose):


And onto the next one. By this point in the match you know that your opponents bidding is beyond optimistic, but so far it's worked. You're 6 boards in to a 10-board IMPs match:

0

#2 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-June-28, 09:34

1. Q with no strong conviction.
2. 4 with strong conviction.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#3 User is offline   WesleyC 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 878
  • Joined: 2009-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2015-June-28, 09:55

1. K. Also happy with Q.

2. 4 seems clear.

For the record, I definitely wouldn't be defending 5S undoubled! :)
0

#4 User is offline   zenbiddist 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 2013-May-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2015-June-28, 17:45

View Postcherdano, on 2015-June-28, 09:34, said:

1. Q with no strong conviction.
2. 4 with strong conviction.

In the second hand, are you still leading a diamond if LHO bids 5?:

0

#5 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2015-June-28, 17:56

View Postzenbiddist, on 2015-June-28, 08:40, said:



Your first board against new opponents. Your lead to 6 (yes, Australian preempts are loose)


And onto the next one. By this point in the match you know that your opponents bidding is beyond optimistic, but so far it's worked. You're 6 boards in to a 10-board IMPs match:

View Postzenbiddist, on 2015-June-28, 17:45, said:



In the second hand, are you still leading a diamond if LHO bids 5?:
Guessing:
  • = 10, = 9. = 6. = 4.
  • = 10, = 9. = 8. = 7.
  • = 10; = 9. = 8, = 7.

0

#6 User is offline   zenbiddist 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 2013-May-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2015-June-29, 08:34

I just wanted to hear peoples' reasoning before I showed the hands. Here they are:

Hand 1 (check out North's takeout double of 3!!):
Posted Image
hosting images
I have a lot of sympathy for my partner, who led a spade (a non-club).

Hand 2:
Posted Image
free image uploading
Partner led the diamond singleton on hand two, which seems like the best shot.

Thankfully the opps' aggro bidding eventually backfired, and we took a rewound contract many off on the last board of the match for a small win :)
0

#7 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,909
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-July-02, 12:37

I'd prob have led a heart on the first hand, though been tempted by a small club.

Diamond obv on the second.
The "4 is a transfer to 4" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users