MPs. Choose what you'd actually call first, but after that, does it affect your decision that P is relatively inexperienced and might take X-then-5D (over 5C) as strength, rather than ELC.
Page 1 of 1
If to sac/How to sac
#1
Posted 2015-June-10, 13:00
MPs. Choose what you'd actually call first, but after that, does it affect your decision that P is relatively inexperienced and might take X-then-5D (over 5C) as strength, rather than ELC.
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
#2
Posted 2015-June-10, 17:10
torn between x and 5d but I definitely wouldn't pass and I dont see it as a sacrifice, surely we're going to have game on quite a lot of the time here?
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
#4
Posted 2015-June-10, 19:37
Hate to let the opps push us around and our bet shot at game looks like 4s but we need p to bid them to play there. No guarantees with this bid but at least it looks reasonable and it is only 1 board at MP. 5d just plain seems too unilateral and is more likely to get x than a 4s contract.
x = 7 p = 5 4s = 3 5d = 3
x = 7 p = 5 4s = 3 5d = 3
#5
Posted 2015-June-10, 21:02
Double.
The chance to defend 4Hx or play 4S is worth the risk of a bad score if partner has long clubs.
The chance to defend 4Hx or play 4S is worth the risk of a bad score if partner has long clubs.
#6
Posted 2015-June-12, 14:35
Double. I am not enamored with this bid, mostly due to the poor quality of my spade suit, but we have no better alternatives.
Page 1 of 1