Would you pursue slam?
#1
Posted 2015-March-26, 05:12
Would you go for slam and if so how? I expect most to say yes but tbh, while I wanted to, I didn't know how; slams after NT openings is not a strong area of mine =/.
#2
Posted 2015-March-26, 05:14
ahydra
#3
Posted 2015-March-26, 05:38
Plus the west hand should have slam in the back of his/her mind even if the 1NT opener was a weak NT (note slam is just as good without the ♣K). 14 points all of which are control cards and a 6-4-2-1 shape is a powerful hand if at all fitting. And east is fitting.
#4
Posted 2015-March-26, 06:09
#5
Posted 2015-March-26, 22:26
#6
Posted 2015-March-26, 22:37
Pls note this is not easy as some may think.
for me 4c after 3d ...sets d as trumps and is a cuebid.
but I do not think this is 100% clear the best bid.
#7
Posted 2015-March-26, 22:42
1NT 2D
2H 3D
Without additional agreements, the continuations would be natural. 3H shows heart support, 3NT shows no interest in either red suit and other bids would suggest at least some interest in playing diamonds.
However, a simple improvement on this method inverts the meanings of 3M & 4m. Now all hands with a good fit for responder's minor suit start by bidding 3M, while the bids above 3NT show hands with slam interest and a fit for the major (but deny a primary fit for the minor).
The reason this is an improvement is that it keeps the auction below 3NT on the minor fit hands (where 3NT is still a likely final contract). While if you have a major fit, you will always end up in 4M anyways so going past 3NT is never a disaster. It also frees up the other 3 level bids to be NT 'probes' which might enable you to highlight a weakness and play in a 5/2 major fit or 4/4 minor fit instead.
#8
Posted 2015-March-27, 02:43
But after this I feel like West shouldn't just punt 4NT (RKCB), because they need to know about the diamonds. Could someone just spell it out to me and give the exact sequence from 1NT to 6H.
#9
Posted 2015-March-27, 03:03
over 3d you have problem..
do not do not assume 3h is 1000% best.
#11
Posted 2015-March-27, 06:25
Cyberyeti, on 2015-March-27, 06:07, said:
I think best is a call to show the double fit. That is part of my 1NT structure (often posted, not made up for this hand!) but not standard for most. You could do it in standard methods by using 3♥ to agree one suit and 4m to agree the other. Then 4♥ could represent a double fit - but again, do not try this without discussion!
#13
Posted 2015-March-27, 10:17
1NT (15-17 bal)
2D (5 hearts, bid hearts partner)
2H (complying with your wishes)
3D (4 diamonds as well as 5 hearts, game forcing, possibly slammy or at least concerned that 3NT is not the best spot)
What now? Ah, I know, I can see an 8 card fit in hearts and a 9 card fit in diamonds. plus my diamonds are good, plus I don't have a spade stop and not much in clubs. Therefore I agree diamonds. 4♦. (That may not be the optimum continuation, but the reasoning is sound and easy to remember).
West can now do a bunch of things, but one of the most obvious is RKCB as from West's point of view there are no voids or suits without at least 2nd round control.
People can get more sophisticated as they learn. First thing is to recognise slam potential and get there somehow.
#14
Posted 2015-March-27, 13:43
However, a simple improvement on this method inverts the meanings of 3M & 4m. Now all hands with a good fit for responder's minor suit start by bidding 3M, while the bids above 3NT show hands with slam interest and a fit for the major (but deny a primary fit for the minor)
[/quote]
I don't see the upside. Using 3M as support for the minor is nothing but noise. I suppose in the actual auction you could play 3S as diamond support and 3H as either heart support or club concentration + diamond support with 3S being a punt to clarify opener.
I still prefer any four level call after 3D to confirm a heart and a diamond fit. The key to finding many of these slams is knowing about the double fit earlier.
Over an auction like 1N - transfer - accept- 3C the idea of 3M as coming in the minor is especially bad and I hope you aren't suggesting that.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#15
Posted 2015-March-27, 14:52
Phil, on 2015-March-27, 13:43, said:
I think the idea was using step 1 to show minor support, so 3♦ in that auction. This is essentially what I do but within the context of second round transfers, so it is bidding the minor itself that shows support. It is not an unreasonable approach when you do not have that extra step.
#16
Posted 2015-March-28, 18:56
Phil, on 2015-March-27, 13:43, said:
I assumed he meant 3 of the other major. Or, do you think that is especially bad too?
#17
Posted 2015-March-29, 07:33
aguahombre, on 2015-March-28, 18:56, said:
This possibility is a lot worse imho.
#18
Posted 2015-March-31, 02:09
NickRW, on 2015-March-27, 10:17, said:
Thank you, indeed it is a bit beyond what my partner and I have discussed, our system does not go much further than a basic SA or 2/1 depending on what we feel like. We have essentially no discussion past the 3m bid (to show 5-4 GF) other than maybe 3NT to show no fit in either suit (or a preference to 3NT over minor game) and game signoffs in 4 & 5 ♥ & ♦ respectively.
#19
Posted 2015-March-31, 11:09
1N - 2♦
2♥ - 3♦
3♥(1) - 3♠(2)
4N(3) - et c.
(1) This shows heart support and slam interest. Heart support without slam interest bids 4♥ at this point. Other suits are cues in support of diamonds.
(2) Cue bid.
(3) At this point, 7N is stone dead cold (well - not quite, but close enough) if partner has all 4 key cards, and 6♥ is pretty good if partner has any 3. Time for RKCB.
#20
Posted 2015-April-02, 09:59
akwoo, on 2015-March-31, 11:09, said:
1N - 2♦
2♥ - 3♦
3♥(1) - 3♠(2)
4N(3) - et c.
(1) This shows heart support and slam interest. Heart support without slam interest bids 4♥ at this point. Other suits are cues in support of diamonds.
(2) Cue bid.
(3) At this point, 7N is stone dead cold (well - not quite, but close enough) if partner has all 4 key cards, and 6♥ is pretty good if partner has any 3. Time for RKCB.
Thanks, I like this sequence, very intuitive.