akwoo, on 2014-September-12, 20:42, said:
However, I think it's clear from this thread it doesn't matter what I think; it matters what your partner and you agree on.
One choice is that you agree West has a normal 3♣ overcall, and East passes with that hand opposite. You miss some games, but you compete better on partscodes.
Another choice is that you agree West should not overcall 3♣ on the West hand, and East should bid over the 3♣ overcall. Your game bidding is better, but sometimes you sell out to 2♠ or 3♠ when you're better off playing 3♣ or 4♣.
Why are those the only 2 options? Personally I would overcall 3C and I would bid with the east hand. Sometimes you both have minimums with Qx opp Jx (3 points that are worth zero) and it doesn't work out. You don't have a lot of room when they preempt and you are going to have to guess. Is it really such a disaster to play 4C anyways? Sometimes I'll go down 1, and they obviously make at least 2 spades.
And by the way, overcalling at imps is a lot better than at MP vul. Like on this hand no one would care if they played 4C instead of defended 2S, but if you go for 200 in 3C (or 4C) that is a complete disaster at MP. And if you get to a light 3N, that's good at MP but even better at imps vul.
Also this is a funny thread to read when there is another one going on right now where almost everyone else agreed with overcalling 3C on A x Axxx AKJxxxx lol.