What's the best line? A seemingly simple hand
#1
Posted 2014-April-08, 05:30
♠982
♥A62
♦Q6
♣AQ853
♠AK54
♥K8743
♦T5
♣K7
How would you play this? What suggested your line of play?
A strong player disliked my line and so now I'm curious about the hand.
#2
Posted 2014-April-08, 06:25
Although I'm no wizard, so won't be surprised if someone finds better.
-gwnn
#3
Posted 2014-April-08, 06:44
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#4
Posted 2014-April-08, 08:07
♠ A
♥ K
♣ K-A
♣ 3 and ruff if E follows.
If 3-3 clubs we do not lose anything. We now can go dummy with ♥ A and play clubs.
If someone ruffs 3rd ♣ we discard a ♦ , they now cash a ♦ and they may play 4th ♣ while we discard a ♠. and they ruff again. Take the ♠ shift, go dummy with ♥ A and discard another spade on 5th club ?
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#5
Posted 2014-April-08, 08:19
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#7
Posted 2014-April-10, 02:46
rhm, on 2014-April-08, 08:29, said:
However, the above line wins when clubs are 3-3 and trumps 4-1.
Rainer Herrmann
Yes. I'm not confident of gauging the probability of suit breaks very well, especially in a rush. At the table I judged that suits were probably breaking relatively nicely because my hands were balanced-ish and because nobody bid. Rather than hoping for a 3-3 break in a black suit, or playing for 4-1 trumps, I ducked a heart at trick two. The opponents cashed two diamonds then played a spade. I won and cashed ♥K, ♣K-A and ruffed a club, glad that I wasn't over-ruffed. Now I was able to cross to dummy's ♥A and pitch losing spades on the established clubs.
My line goes off when the player with the third trump has only two clubs (slightly more likely I guess), and has a spade left. A few good players told me they'd play two top hearts, then club club club pitching a diamond. I'm still not sure which line works in the most cases. Is there a shortcut for this kind of thinking? I don't have the brain to go case-by-case quickly enough at the table. Thanks for looking everyone
#8
Posted 2014-April-10, 05:41
zenbiddist, on 2014-April-10, 02:46, said:
This is not a bad line, but consider this ordinary layout
Two top heart loses. West does not ruff the third club, but discards diamonds and waits until he gets in to draw dummy's last trump.
Saving the ♥A for later and as a late entry to dummy avoids this problem. (If West ruffs the third round of clubs and plays a diamond to East, South should not ruff the ♣9, but discard a spade.)
With regard to your question, unfortunately I do not know a shortcut and I do not think there is one.
It is often difficult to see different lines of play in the first place and comparing them is anything but easy in complex cases.
You can either try to compute their absolute probability to succeed or you can compare two lines, by comparing only the layouts where one wins over the other.
Both methods are not trivial and require a lot of expertise and some mathematical background.
I know because I see errors even in recently published books on expert play.
This is one area where I think double dummy programs should get better. Double Dummy simulators (in this case deal out only the defenders cards) should be improved to tell you which line worked most of the time.
If the sample is large enough this is very likely the best line or very close to it. As I understand good Bridge playing software works like this, but the samples are often quite small to avoid long delays in the play of the hand. So the result is not accurate enough.
Fortunately many deals are not that complex.
The more important issue is to see alternative lines of play in the first place. Experienced Bridge players often have a good feeling which line is more likely to succeed.
Rainer Herrmann
#9
Posted 2014-April-10, 10:37
#13
Posted 2014-April-12, 18:24
zenbiddist, on 2014-April-10, 02:46, said:
My line goes off when the player with the third trump has only two clubs (slightly more likely I guess), and has a spade left. A few good players told me they'd play two top hearts, then club club club pitching a diamond. I'm still not sure which line works in the most cases. Is there a shortcut for this kind of thinking? I don't have the brain to go case-by-case quickly enough at the table. Thanks for looking everyone
♠ and ♥
♠ and ♣
♠ and ♥ and ♣
#14
Posted 2014-November-04, 01:57
6NT South, ♠9 led (matchpoints)
Ps: So ♣, ♣ works when clubs are 4-2, but there are other possibilities. How do people think about this hand? It's quite juicy IMO.
PPs: I'm aware my 4NT bid was probably not going to be interpreted as quant, but that was my excuse for being in the tight slam i was probably going to end up in
#15
Posted 2014-November-04, 02:49
#16
Posted 2014-November-04, 04:21
#17
Posted 2014-November-04, 20:34
zenbiddist, on 2014-November-04, 01:57, said:
Thanks everyone. What about this hand? Similar themes - came up two days ago. Lots of really pretty possibilities. Keen to hear what other people think:
6NT South, ♠9 led (matchpoints)
Ps: So ♣, ♣ works when clubs are 4-2, but there are other possibilities. How do people think about this hand? It's quite juicy IMO.PPs: I'm aware my 4NT bid was probably not going to be interpreted as quant, but that was my excuse for being in the tight slam i was probably going to end up in
antonylee, on 2014-November-04, 04:21, said:
I like antonylee's line
Win ♠ cheaply discarding a ♦
Cash ♣Q. Lead ♣3.
If LHO follows low then finesse ♣9 (In case LHO has made a mistake).
If LHO inserts ♣T or ♣J, then cover and if RHO shows out then finesse ♦8
If RHO does not return a ♦ then reduce to this 4-card ending with the lead in dummy and lead ♥J
If ♥5 is not a winner then you need some luck in ♦.
If ♥5 is good, then discard ♦9 and cash ♥5 for a double squeeze.
#18
Posted 2014-November-05, 10:33
If it looks like opponents know about attitude to first trick and RHO's card looks like discouraging then better to win first trick and play like previous posters have proposed.
Rubens and Rodwell have written books to help you to work out the best line at the table but IMO, it's still hard. Gib and other double-dummy solvers, can help you to work out the best line away from the table. Here among the many possibilities, the main ones that you might consider are that LHO has sole control of:
just ♠