Passing partner's 2nd double. At the 4 level, weakish hand
#1
Posted 2013-September-22, 01:58
♠542
♥K9
♦T864
♣J732
(1♠)-X-(4♠)-Pa
(Pa)-X-(Pa)-?
Is this too little to pass? Or little enough to pass? I think 4NT to ask for the minors is not a bad idea. 4♠ is to play but at this vulnerability it is not a terrible hand. I suppose there's a tendency to double here with less because of the colours, am I right? Anyway, doubler held:
♠
♥Q875
♦AKQ7
♣A9854
Was the double too much?
Opener redoubled. Would this make you bid if you didn't?
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#2
Posted 2013-September-22, 02:08
I think the second double is fine albeit obviously not.without risk .
#3
Posted 2013-September-22, 08:08
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#4
Posted 2013-September-22, 09:40
Hanoi5, on 2013-September-22, 01:58, said:
♠542
♥K9
♦T864
♣J732
(1♠)-X-(4♠)-Pa
(Pa)-X-(Pa)-?
Is this too little to pass? Or little enough to pass? I think 4NT to ask for the minors is not a bad idea. 4♠ is to play but at this vulnerability it is not a terrible hand. I suppose there's a tendency to double here with less because of the colours, am I right? Anyway, doubler held:
♠
♥Q875
♦AKQ7
♣A9854
Was the double too much?
Opener redoubled. Would this make you bid if you didn't?
The redouble should set alarm bells ringing. 2nd hand's takeout double showed support for
the unbid suits so 4th hand should bid his best suit preferring length over HCPs. The spade
void is invaluable.
- Dr Tarrasch(1862-1934)German Chess Grandmaster
Bridge is a game where you have two opponents...and often three(!)
"Any palooka can take tricks with Aces and Kings; the true expert shows his prowess
by how he handles the two's and three's" - Mollo's Hideous Hog
#5
Posted 2013-September-22, 11:16
#6
Posted 2013-September-22, 15:34
After the redouble running out sounds like an interesting idea for both players.
#7
Posted 2013-September-22, 16:39
almost any hand with 4+ tricks. At IMPS that is a nonsense idea since we need the 2nd x for
hands of a similar nature to the example hand. here is little to nothing to be gained by setting
opps 1 trick x and in the process giving up on a game. With this collection the best idea is
to bid
4n
showing 2 places to play letting p choose our minor. The xx just goes to show how looney tunes
these bids are since they may get to play 4sx a fair amount of time and almost never 4s xx------
#8
Posted 2013-September-23, 10:25
PhilG007, on 2013-September-22, 09:40, said:
the unbid suits so 4th hand should bid his best suit preferring length over HCPs. The spade
void is invaluable.
I think you've misread the OP. The spade void is in the doubler's hand. 4th hand has the hand at the top, with 3=2=4=4 shape.
#9
Posted 2013-September-23, 14:16
barmar, on 2013-September-23, 10:25, said:
It is a shame when OPs don't take the trouble to show the hands in diagram form. In this particular OP, we even have to work out for ourselves who is dealer.
#10
Posted 2013-September-23, 14:16
Not perfect by any means and likely to lose out here but at least partner will understand. They won't if I pull and go for a number against our own plus so we take our juice.
What is baby oil made of?