BBO Discussion Forums: 双套牌如何叫? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

双套牌如何叫? 联赛总结

#1 User is offline   dvd 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 624
  • Joined: 2013-April-15

Posted 2013-September-14, 22:38


这幅大家怎么看?我的观点是应该先出d,再叫c;
另外,6h后7c?6n总是可以打的,7c已经偏离轨道了。
0

#2 User is offline   wuhuan 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 705
  • Joined: 2012-October-12

Posted 2013-September-15, 03:57

北家的牌我叫也会是先C后D,牌摊开来看主要是争叫3H,北家空门要重新估值。如果作为北家主打C定约其空门对着同伴大牌意义不大。
0

#3 User is offline   madongjun 

  • China
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,724
  • Joined: 2012-August-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:taiyuan/shanxi/China
  • Interests:Economics、sports

Posted 2013-September-15, 18:19

对方开叫2♠后,不知道南家能不能考虑先PASS,你的副套是对方阻击的套,3♥很难打的。
你PASS后,同伴叫出双低套的不寻常NT,最后的定约停在6NT的可能性比较大。

不过话又说回来,相对来看,还是草花满贯相对容易完成。
0

#4 User is offline   dvd 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 624
  • Joined: 2013-April-15

Posted 2013-September-15, 20:45

先pass不予考虑,丢局的风险过大,没有任何理由认为同伴在h上一定没有配合,总是要叫3h的。
0

#5 User is offline   madongjun 

  • China
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,724
  • Joined: 2012-August-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:taiyuan/shanxi/China
  • Interests:Economics、sports

Posted 2013-September-15, 22:13

东家阻击,不能保证你的同伴有牌力,也许西家有牌力呢?所以,南家争叫3♥也只是一种选择。
个人意见,仅供参考。
0

#6 User is offline   nbxkh 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 371
  • Joined: 2013-July-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:zhejiang china

Posted 2013-September-16, 02:56

奇怪的是,只要我把类似的牌请教职业牌手,他们总是一口的pass。只是如果pass,同伴怎样平衡叫,是个大课题。
0

#7 User is offline   xhq 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 248
  • Joined: 2013-March-17

Posted 2013-September-18, 17:38

此牌北家叫6♦后,南家是否考虑pass或者叫6NT呢;总之6♥这个叫品为之不妥,请大家再发表自己的高见。
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users