What is this?
#1
Posted 2013-March-13, 00:33
1H 1N 2H 2N
Has your partnership discussed this sequence?
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#2
Posted 2013-March-13, 01:01
#3
Posted 2013-March-13, 04:19
#4
Posted 2013-March-13, 06:25
MP, IMP, V, NV?
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#5
Posted 2013-March-13, 07:03
edit: and as above posters have said, 2N is a NT invite.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#6
Posted 2013-March-13, 07:36
wyman, on 2013-March-13, 07:03, said:
edit: and as above posters have said, 2N is a NT invite.
Raising hearts is a 3 card limit raise for me, same hand as 1H 1N 2x 3H
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#7
Posted 2013-March-13, 07:40
jillybean, on 2013-March-13, 07:36, said:
If partner has an extra heart and you have a 3-card limit raise, just bid game imo.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#8
Posted 2013-March-13, 07:47
jillybean, on 2013-March-13, 07:36, said:
if you think that a 9. trump makes such a huge difference, bid game. If not, treat the 6-2 and 6-3 fits equal.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#9
Posted 2013-March-13, 08:12
#10
Posted 2013-March-13, 08:15
wyman, on 2013-March-13, 07:40, said:
This is the problem, I dont have a 3 card limit raise.
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#11
Posted 2013-March-13, 08:16
edit to avoid anyone else having the misunderstanding that came following this post: This is in response to Zel's question about 4522.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#12
Posted 2013-March-13, 08:17
Zelandakh, on 2013-March-13, 08:12, said:
6 or a very good 5.
2♣, partner knows this can be bid with as few as 2.
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#13
Posted 2013-March-13, 08:18
jillybean, on 2013-March-13, 08:15, said:
I am confused.
What I'm saying is that if you hold a 3-card limit raise, bid 4H over 2H.
3H over 2H shows the hand you posted.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#14
Posted 2013-March-13, 08:18
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#15
Posted 2013-March-13, 08:19
jillybean, on 2013-March-13, 08:17, said:
...in most systems. Pretty sure that the "or a vg 5" part is nonstandard. Certainly in every partnership I've played, 2H over a forcing NT unambiguously shows 6+.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#16
Posted 2013-March-13, 08:20
jillybean, on 2013-March-13, 08:18, said:
2C was clearly @ Zel and re: 4522 in the auction 1H-1N
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#17
Posted 2013-March-13, 08:24
wyman, on 2013-March-13, 08:18, said:
What I'm saying is that if you hold a 3-card limit raise, bid 4H over 2H.
3H over 2H shows the hand you posted.
I was the one who was confused.
I'm afraid that bidding game over 2H would get us to too many hopeless games.
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#18
Posted 2013-March-13, 08:32
jillybean, on 2013-March-13, 08:24, said:
I'm afraid that bidding game over 2H would get us to too many hopeless games.
Agree. Maybe I am misunderstanding wyman but .. if we bid game with a 3 card limit raise after opener's minimum rebid, then aren't we basically abandoning invitations and treating them all as gameforces?
-gwnn
#19
Posted 2013-March-13, 08:33
jillybean, on 2013-March-13, 08:24, said:
I'm afraid that bidding game over 2H would get us to too many hopeless games.
Nah, if you routinely open 10 counts with 6 card suits at the 1-level, don't treat a marginal 9-count or 10-count as a limit raise, especially at MPs. In my experience, you don't get to a no-play game very often at all opposite an 11-16 6-bagger when you're holding a 3 card LR.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#20
Posted 2013-March-13, 08:34
billw55, on 2013-March-13, 08:32, said:
No because 2H shows extra length.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff

Help
