Grand Slam Force 5NT Correct respose
#2
Posted 2013-January-12, 11:02
That said, I would lie through my teeth and if my scheme was:
6♣ - none or Q
6♦ - K or A
6♥ - K or A and extra length
I'd show K or A and extra length not two. Why ? my worry is that partner has AKQxxxx, xxxxxx, void, void or similar and nothing makes beyond 6♥. If partner has the A he'll probably bid 7 anyway reckoning the Q is irrelevant.
#3
Posted 2013-January-12, 11:45
First time you have played with him, so nothing fancy
2♠ showed 2/3 top honors, and you are playing 1430 RKCB
#4
Posted 2013-January-12, 14:13
We play
6C = A or K
6D = Queen
6H = none
6NT = 2
7C = 3
but this may not be obvious without agreement.
However, with 2 of them I'd definitely bid something above 6NT if this wasn't discussed.
p.s. I'm not sure why you think partner has a double void, what's wrong with AKxxx Axxx Axxx - ?
A bit of s shock opposite a 2C opener, but consistent with the auction.
#5
Posted 2013-January-12, 15:51
pigpenz, on 2013-January-12, 11:45, said:
Then perhaps he should learn to keep the bidding low with good hands. But lets give him credit for knowing what he's doing and that he's asking us to bid a Grand with two of the top three trump honors which we have.
This is the standard way this convention is played in the US. Of course, many pairs have different responses as mentioned here.
#6
Posted 2013-January-12, 16:46
FrancesHinden, on 2013-January-12, 14:13, said:
p.s. I'm not sure why you think partner has a double void, what's wrong with AKxxx Axxx Axxx - ?
A bit of s shock opposite a 2C opener, but consistent with the auction.
Because I didn't have an idea at the time that this was not a regular partnership when I posted and I'd bid 5♣ exclusion not 5N on that.
#8
Posted 2013-January-13, 07:37
FrancesHinden, on 2013-January-13, 04:04, said:
It keeps you a little lower and you may be able to find out more easily whether 7N is better, although with a hand that big it's very likely to be solid. I suppose void, KQJxxxxxx, KQ, KQ is just possible.
Funny you say your hand is a bit of a shock, I have held x, A, AKxxx, Axxxxx opposite a 2♣ opener, pard had AKQJxxxx, KQ10x, x, void and the auction went 2♣-3♣-4♠(solid suit)-7N.
#9
Posted 2013-January-13, 11:06
Maybe 7♣ if it it shows solid suit may make more likely to be in 7nt after ♦ cue bid
#10
Posted 2013-January-13, 11:30
pigpenz, on 2013-January-13, 11:06, said:
Maybe 7♣ if it it shows solid suit may make more likely to be in 7nt after ♦ cue bid
Yes, I bid 5♣ exclusion, partner shows 1, I ask about the Q♥, partner shows it plus the A♣, I bid 7N.
#11
Posted 2013-January-13, 15:36
pigpenz, on 2013-January-13, 11:06, said:
Maybe 7♣ if it it shows solid suit may make more likely to be in 7nt after ♦ cue bid
Recommended auction: 2C - 7NT. What on earth do you think partner has to open 2C?
I don't think I've ever seen combined 40-count before.
#12
Posted 2013-January-13, 15:46
Edit: I mean they both have 2 loser hands, it's just so sick.
#13
Posted 2013-January-13, 15:49
FrancesHinden, on 2013-January-13, 15:36, said:
I don't think I've ever seen combined 40-count before.
8 solid clubs and KQJT of diamonds? lol
#14
Posted 2013-January-13, 16:13
JLOGIC, on 2013-January-13, 15:49, said:
Might still make on a club lead.
-- Bertrand Russell
#15
Posted 2013-January-13, 17:12
#16
Posted 2013-January-13, 18:24
without the A♣ they all play sort of bastardized 4 losers for opening 2♣ so change the A♣
to the 9♣ and they would open 2♣...ouch